Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;23(1):76-82.
doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328334dda8.

Management of catheter-associated urinary tract infection

Barbara W Trautner  1
Affiliations
Review

Management of catheter-associated urinary tract infection

Barbara W Trautner. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this article is to review recent publications concerning the management of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), including the issues of diagnosis and prevention. Articles reviewed include the various guidelines concerning CAUTI released recently by multiple organizations.

Recent findings: There has been a recent upsurge of interest in prevention of CAUTI and a proliferation of guidelines in this area. Social changes in US government reimbursement to hospitals and public reporting of hospital-acquired infections may underlie this interest. The awareness that CAUTI and catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria are distinct conditions is increasing, but unnecessary treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria remains quite prevalent. The focus in recent CAUTI literature is on prevention, often through strategies to minimize urinary catheter use. Very little new evidence is available to guide diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Summary: Interpretation of many studies of CAUTI is impeded by the failure to distinguish between symptomatic CAUTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria in the study outcomes. This distinction currently relies on clinical symptoms and is not easily made, even with the help of various guidelines. Many aspects of the management of CAUTI merit further study, and the current interest in CAUTI is likely to lead to exciting advances in this field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author is not aware of any conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Weinstein JW, Mazon D, Pantelick E, et al. A decade of prevalence surveys in a tertiary-care center: trends in nosocomial infection rates, device utilization, and patient acuity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Aug;20(8):543–8. - PubMed
    1. Richards M, Edwards J, Culver D, Gaynes R. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21:510–5. - PubMed
    1. Saint S, Kowalski CP, Kaufman SR, et al. Preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in the United States: a national study. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):243–50. This survey of infection control coordinators at 119 Veterans Affairs and 600 non-federal US hospitals gives a snapshot view of what hospitals were or were not doing in 2005to prevent hospital-acquired UTI. - PubMed
    1. Brown J, Doloresco F, III, Mylotte JM. “Never events”: not every hospital-acquired infection is preventable. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 1;49(5):743–6. The authors provide a cogent critique of the Medicare reimbursement changes. - PubMed
    1. Saint S, Meddings JA, Calfee D, et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection and the Medicare rule changes. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 16;150(12):877–84. The authors look at potential positive and negative outcomes of the Medicare reimbursement changes, and they provide a very clear flow diagram of the coding errors that may result. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms