Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009;24(6):241-6.
doi: 10.1002/jca.20222.

Immunoadsorption apheresis and immunosuppressive drug therapy in the treatment of complicated HCV-related cryoglobulinemia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Immunoadsorption apheresis and immunosuppressive drug therapy in the treatment of complicated HCV-related cryoglobulinemia

Claudia Stefanutti et al. J Clin Apher. 2009.

Abstract

The immunosuppressive drug therapy (IDT) is not always effective to avoid the development of complications in hepatitis C virus-related cryoglobulinemia (HCV-Cr). Removal of cryoglobulins by therapeutic plasmapheresis is currently accepted. In this randomized, parallel group study, 17 male and female patients aged 43-79 years, with complicated HCV-Cr, were submitted for 12 weeks (initial immunosuppressive therapy) to IDT (alpha-interferon, pegylated-interferon alpha-2a, cyclophosphamide, methylprednisolone, prednisone, cyclosporine, ribavirin, and melphalan). Then, they were randomly assigned to two parallel groups: A # 9 patients treated by immunoadsorption apheresis (Selesorb((R))) (IA) plus IDT, and B # 8 patients submitted to IDT only, for further 12 weeks. # 187 IA aphereses were performed. No adverse reactions or complications were observed. A Clinical Score (CS) was adapted from a pre-existing scoring model to evaluate signs and symptoms inherent to the underlying immunologic disorder. The CS was calculated at baseline (CS0), after the initial immunosuppressive therapy (CS1 = 12 weeks) when patients were treated only with IDT, and at the end of the study (24 weeks) in the group A (CSA; IA plus IDT) and B (CSB; IDT only). The score did not change significantly from CS0 to CS1. However, statistically significant differences were observed between CS1 and CSA (P < 0.001), and CSA versus CSB (P = 0.03), respectively. The changes observed were favorable to the patients assigned to the IA plus IDT group (A): in most case relief of symptoms and complications have been obtained.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources