Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov 24;41(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-51.

Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations

Affiliations

Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations

Ben J Hayes et al. Genet Sel Evol. .

Abstract

Background: Two key findings from genomic selection experiments are 1) the reference population used must be very large to subsequently predict accurate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), and 2) prediction equations derived in one breed do not predict accurate GEBV when applied to other breeds. Both findings are a problem for breeds where the number of individuals in the reference population is limited. A multi-breed reference population is a potential solution, and here we investigate the accuracies of GEBV in Holstein dairy cattle and Jersey dairy cattle when the reference population is single breed or multi-breed. The accuracies were obtained both as a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix and from the realised accuracies of GEBV.

Methods: Best linear unbiased prediction with a multi-breed genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP) and two Bayesian methods (BAYESA and BAYES_SSVS) which estimate individual SNP effects were used to predict GEBV for 400 and 77 young Holstein and Jersey bulls respectively, from a reference population of 781 and 287 Holstein and Jersey bulls, respectively. Genotypes of 39,048 SNP markers were used. Phenotypes in the reference population were de-regressed breeding values for production traits. For the GBLUP method, expected accuracies calculated from the diagonal of the inverse of coefficient matrix were compared to realised accuracies.

Results: When GBLUP was used, expected accuracies from a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix agreed reasonably well with realised accuracies calculated from the correlation between GEBV and EBV in single breed populations, but not in multi-breed populations. When the Bayesian methods were used, realised accuracies of GEBV were up to 13% higher when the multi-breed reference population was used than when a pure breed reference was used. However no consistent increase in accuracy across traits was obtained.

Conclusion: Predicting genomic breeding values using a genomic relationship matrix is an attractive approach to implement genomic selection as expected accuracies of GEBV can be readily derived. However in multi-breed populations, Bayesian approaches give higher accuracies for some traits. Finally, multi-breed reference populations will be a valuable resource to fine map QTL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Genomic relationship between animals in reference and validation sets. Note that the genomic relationships have been re-scaled such that all elements are positive.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SNP effects for fat% from BayesA in the region of the DGAT1 gene on chromosome 14, from either a Holstein reference population, a Jersey reference population, or a combined reference population.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819–1829. - PMC - PubMed
    1. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel F. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:16–24. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1514. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Goddard ME. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:1313. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harris BL, Johnson DL, Spelman RJ. Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting, Niagara Falls, Canada. 2008.
    1. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman R, Goddard ME. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics. 2008;179:1503–1512. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.084301. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources