Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations
- PMID: 19930712
- PMCID: PMC2791750
- DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-51
Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations
Abstract
Background: Two key findings from genomic selection experiments are 1) the reference population used must be very large to subsequently predict accurate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), and 2) prediction equations derived in one breed do not predict accurate GEBV when applied to other breeds. Both findings are a problem for breeds where the number of individuals in the reference population is limited. A multi-breed reference population is a potential solution, and here we investigate the accuracies of GEBV in Holstein dairy cattle and Jersey dairy cattle when the reference population is single breed or multi-breed. The accuracies were obtained both as a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix and from the realised accuracies of GEBV.
Methods: Best linear unbiased prediction with a multi-breed genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP) and two Bayesian methods (BAYESA and BAYES_SSVS) which estimate individual SNP effects were used to predict GEBV for 400 and 77 young Holstein and Jersey bulls respectively, from a reference population of 781 and 287 Holstein and Jersey bulls, respectively. Genotypes of 39,048 SNP markers were used. Phenotypes in the reference population were de-regressed breeding values for production traits. For the GBLUP method, expected accuracies calculated from the diagonal of the inverse of coefficient matrix were compared to realised accuracies.
Results: When GBLUP was used, expected accuracies from a function of elements of the inverse coefficient matrix agreed reasonably well with realised accuracies calculated from the correlation between GEBV and EBV in single breed populations, but not in multi-breed populations. When the Bayesian methods were used, realised accuracies of GEBV were up to 13% higher when the multi-breed reference population was used than when a pure breed reference was used. However no consistent increase in accuracy across traits was obtained.
Conclusion: Predicting genomic breeding values using a genomic relationship matrix is an attractive approach to implement genomic selection as expected accuracies of GEBV can be readily derived. However in multi-breed populations, Bayesian approaches give higher accuracies for some traits. Finally, multi-breed reference populations will be a valuable resource to fine map QTL.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4114-29. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5019. J Dairy Sci. 2012. PMID: 22720968
-
Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.J Anim Sci. 2014 Aug;92(8):3270-83. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7375. J Anim Sci. 2014. PMID: 25074450
-
Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;91(10):4669-78. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-5715. J Anim Sci. 2013. PMID: 24078618
-
Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646. J Dairy Sci. 2009. PMID: 19164653 Review.
-
Genomic Selection and Use of Molecular Tools in Breeding Programs for Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle in Developing Countries: Current Status and Future Prospects.Front Genet. 2019 Jan 9;9:694. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00694. eCollection 2018. Front Genet. 2019. PMID: 30687382 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Oct 24;46(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0061-9. Genet Sel Evol. 2014. PMID: 25927468 Free PMC article.
-
Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Dec 7;44(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-39. Genet Sel Evol. 2012. PMID: 23216664 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of genomic prediction within and across generations in maritime pine.BMC Genomics. 2016 Aug 11;17(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2879-8. BMC Genomics. 2016. PMID: 27515254 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting accuracy of estimated effective number of chromosome segments for numerically small breeds.J Anim Breed Genet. 2021 Mar;138(2):151-160. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12512. Epub 2020 Oct 10. J Anim Breed Genet. 2021. PMID: 33040409 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Non-additive Effects on the Genetic Correlation Between Populations.G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Feb 6;10(2):783-795. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400663. G3 (Bethesda). 2020. PMID: 31857332 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Harris BL, Johnson DL, Spelman RJ. Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting, Niagara Falls, Canada. 2008.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources