Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites: the lateral left ventricular wall and the coronary sinus are rarely the best sites
- PMID: 19931364
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.045
Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites: the lateral left ventricular wall and the coronary sinus are rarely the best sites
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to evaluate the impact of the left ventricular (LV) pacing site on hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Background: CRT reduces morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients. However, 20% to 40% of eligible patients may not fully benefit from CRT device implantation. We hypothesized that selecting the optimal LV pacing site could be critical in this issue.
Methods: Thirty-five patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy referred for CRT device implantation were studied. Intraventricular dyssynchrony and latest activated LV wall were defined by tissue Doppler imaging analysis before the study. Eleven predetermined LV pacing sites were systematically assessed in random order: basal and mid-cavity (septal, anterior, lateral, inferior), apex, coronary sinus (CS), and the endocardial site facing the CS pacing site. For each patient, +dP/dT(max), -dP/dT(min), pulse pressure, and end-systolic pressure during baseline (AAI) and DDD LV pacing were compared. Two atrioventricular delays were tested.
Results: Major interindividual and intraindividual variations of hemodynamic response depending on the LV pacing site were observed. Compared with baseline, LV DDD pacing at the best LV position significantly improved +dP/dT(max) (+31 +/- 26%, p < 0.001) and was superior to pacing the CS (+15 +/- 23%, p < 0.001), the lateral LV wall (+18 +/- 22%, p < 0.001), or the latest activated LV wall (+11 +/- 17%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The pacing site is a primary determinant of the hemodynamic response to LV pacing in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Pacing at the best LV site is associated acutely with fewer nonresponders and twice the improvement in +dP/dT(max) observed with CS pacing.
Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Enhancing the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: is it time to individualize the left ventricular pacing site?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 9;55(6):576-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.017. Epub 2009 Nov 20. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 19931363 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.014. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20797490
-
Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6;58(11):1128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.042. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21884950
-
Does RV lead positioning provide additional benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure?Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct;29(10):1069-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00500.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006. PMID: 17038138
-
Left ventricular endocardial stimulation for severe heart failure.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10):747-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.038. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20797486 Review.
-
Understanding nonresponders of cardiac resynchronization therapy--current and future perspectives.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Oct;16(10):1117-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40829.x. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16191124 Review.
Cited by
-
Splinting and mechanical disruption of the mitral valve apparatus by an endocardial left ventricular lead while delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy.Clin Case Rep. 2018 Sep 17;6(11):2081-2085. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1758. eCollection 2018 Nov. Clin Case Rep. 2018. PMID: 30455895 Free PMC article.
-
The use of epicardial electrogram as a simple guide to select the optimal site of left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy.Cardiol Res Pract. 2011 Feb 20;2011:956062. doi: 10.4061/2011/956062. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011. PMID: 21403903 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal site selection and image fusion guidance technology to facilitate cardiac resynchronization therapy.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Aug;15(8):555-570. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1502084. Epub 2018 Jul 30. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018. PMID: 30019954 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Animal models of dyssynchrony.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Apr;5(2):135-45. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9336-5. Epub 2011 Dec 1. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012. PMID: 22130900 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Past, present, and future of CRT.Heart Fail Rev. 2011 May;16(3):205-14. doi: 10.1007/s10741-010-9214-2. Heart Fail Rev. 2011. PMID: 21132525 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous