What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer?
- PMID: 19931898
- PMCID: PMC2889156
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.014
What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer?
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the long-term survival following radical prostatectomy in the population with high-risk prostate cancer. Despite considerable stage migration associated with widespread prostate-specific antigen screening, as many as one-third of incident prostate cancers have high-risk features. These patients are often treated with combined radiation and androgen deprivation therapy, and less is known about the long-term survival in this population after radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: Between 1992 and 2008, 175 men underwent RP by a single surgeon with D'Amico high-risk prostate cancer (clinical stage ≥T2c, biopsy Gleason score 8-10, or prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL). In this population, we examined the rates and predictors of biochemical progression, metastatic disease, and cancer-specific mortality.
Results: Among 175 high-risk patients, 63 (36%) had organ-confined disease in the RP specimen. At 10 years, biochemical recurrence-free survival was 68%, metastasis-free survival was 84%, and prostate cancer-specific survival was 92%. The 10-year rate of freedom from any hormonal therapy was 71%. Of the high-risk criteria, a biopsy Gleason score of 8-10 (vs ≤7) was the strongest independent predictor of biochemical recurrence, metastases, and prostate cancer death.
Conclusions: National data suggest that RP may be underutilized for the management of high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer. Our data suggest that surgical treatment can result in long-term progression-free survival in a subset of carefully selected high-risk men. Further prospective studies are warranted to directly compare the outcomes of RP vs combined radiation and hormonal therapy in high-risk patients.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 22487441
-
Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11371.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22788795 Free PMC article.
-
Pathological results and rates of treatment failure in high-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(5):765-770. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09594.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 20875089
-
Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10986.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22373045 Free PMC article.
-
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32495338 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.World J Urol. 2015 Sep;33(9):1269-74. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1430-2. Epub 2014 Nov 1. World J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25366883
-
Population-based 10-year event-free survival after radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer in British Columbia.Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):409-13. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3288. Epub 2015 Dec 14. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015. PMID: 26788230 Free PMC article.
-
Older patients with low Charlson score and high-risk prostate cancer benefit from radical prostatectomy.World J Urol. 2016 Oct;34(10):1367-72. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1784-8. Epub 2016 Feb 20. World J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26897499
-
Overall survival of high-risk prostate cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy at a single institution.Int J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;22(6):1087-1093. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1160-8. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28681153 Clinical Trial.
-
Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Apr;13(2):179-86. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0240-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2012. PMID: 22314881 Review.
References
-
- D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Jama. 1998;280:969–974. - PubMed
-
- Nguyen CT, Reuther AM, Stephenson AJ, et al. The specific definition of high risk prostate cancer has minimal impact on biochemical relapse-free survival. J Urol. 2009;181:75–80. - PubMed
-
- Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol. 2007;177:2106–2131. - PubMed
-
- Meng MV, Elkin EP, Latini DM, et al. Treatment of patients with high risk localized prostate cancer: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (CaPSURE) J Urol. 2005;173:1557–1561. - PubMed
-
- Denberg TD, Glode LM, Steiner JF, et al. Trends and predictors of aggressive therapy for clinical locally advanced prostate carcinoma. BJU Int. 2006;98:335–340. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical