Pregnancy testing in women of reproductive age in US emergency departments, 2002 to 2006: assessment of a national quality measure
- PMID: 19931941
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.08.017
Pregnancy testing in women of reproductive age in US emergency departments, 2002 to 2006: assessment of a national quality measure
Abstract
Study objective: We assess performance and explore definitions for a new emergency department (ED) quality measure: the proportion of women aged 14 to 50 years who have abdominal pain and receive pregnancy testing (aimed at detecting ectopic pregnancy).
Methods: We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (2002 to 2006) to test trends and predictors of the new measure, using both restrictive and broad definitions from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and reason-for-visit codes, and determine the proportion of women with ectopic pregnancy who had undergone pregnancy testing. For comparison, we conducted a detailed chart review in 4 US hospitals among patients who visited the ED in 2006.
Results: Using a broad ICD-9 definition for inclusion in NHAMCS, 2.13 million women aged 14 to 50 years with abdominal pain visited an ED annually between 2002 and 2006. Of those, 33.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.5% to 35.5%) received pregnancy testing. Testing rates were materially stable, regardless of the definition used (broad or restrictive ICD-9 or reason-for-visit code). Among women with an ICD-9 diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, 55.6% (95% CI 43.7% to 67.6%) had a documented pregnancy test. In the chart review, among 200 women aged 14 to 50 years and with abdominal pain, 89.4% (95% CI 85.0% to 94.0%) were eligible for the measure; of those, 93.9% (95% CI 90.3% to 97.4%) received testing.
Conclusion: Analysis of national ED survey data demonstrated a large performance gap for a new pregnancy testing quality measure, whereas focused chart review at 4 sites showed a smaller gap. Given these discrepancies, additional study is recommended before the widespread implementation of the pregnancy testing measure as an assessment of ED performance.
Copyright 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Journal Club: The NHAMCS database, chart review methods, and more on regression modeling.Ann Emerg Med. 2010 May;55(5):458-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.021. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20417381 No abstract available.
-
Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. The NHAMCS database, chart review methods, and more on regression modeling answers to the May 2010 journal club questions.Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.025. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20868913 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Performance in appropriate Rh testing and treatment with Rh immunoglobulin in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;59(4):285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 9. Ann Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22153971
-
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary.Adv Data. 2001 Jun 25;(320):1-34. Adv Data. 2001. PMID: 12666256
-
National estimation of rates of HIV serology testing in US emergency departments 1993-2005: baseline prior to the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations.AIDS. 2008 Oct 18;22(16):2127-34. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328310e066. AIDS. 2008. PMID: 18832876
-
Ondansetron use in the pediatric emergency department and effects on hospitalization and return rates: are we masking alternative diagnoses?Ann Emerg Med. 2010 May;55(5):415-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.011. Epub 2010 Jan 19. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20031265
-
Pearls and pitfalls in the emergency department evaluation of abdominal pain.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003 Feb;21(1):61-72, vi. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(02)00080-9. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003. PMID: 12630731 Review.
Cited by
-
Is routine pregnancy test necessary in women of reproductive age admitted to the emergency department?World J Emerg Med. 2013;4(3):175-8. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2013.03.003. World J Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 25215114 Free PMC article.
-
The Devil Is in the Details but the Details Are Not in NHAMCS.J Med Toxicol. 2016 Jun;12(2):145-7. doi: 10.1007/s13181-016-0541-0. Epub 2016 Apr 15. J Med Toxicol. 2016. PMID: 27083902 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic Uncertainty in Dyspneic Patients with Cancer in the Emergency Department.West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 29;22(2):170-176. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.10.48091. West J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 33856297 Free PMC article.
-
Low rates of pregnancy screening in adolescents before teratogenic exposures in a national sample of children's hospitals.Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;122(21):3394-3400. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30225. Epub 2016 Sep 12. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27618636 Free PMC article.
-
False negative point-of-care urine pregnancy tests in an urban academic emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 May 1;2(3):e12427. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12427. eCollection 2021 Jun. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021. PMID: 33969349 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous