Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 27;364(1536):3633-47.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0146.

Lexical-semantic priming effects during infancy

Affiliations

Lexical-semantic priming effects during infancy

Natalia Arias-Trejo et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

When and how do infants develop a semantic system of words that are related to each other? We investigated word-word associations in early lexical development using an adaptation of the inter-modal preferential looking task where word pairs (as opposed to single target words) were used to direct infants' attention towards a target picture. Two words (prime and target) were presented in quick succession after which infants were presented with a picture pair (target and distracter). Prime-target word pairs were either semantically and associatively related or unrelated; the targets were either named or unnamed. Experiment 1 demonstrated a lexical-semantic priming effect for 21-month olds but not for 18-month olds: unrelated prime words interfered with linguistic target identification for 21-month olds. Follow-up experiments confirmed the interfering effects of unrelated prime words and identified the existence of repetition priming effects as young as 18 months of age. The results of these experiments indicate that infants have begun to develop semantic-associative links between lexical items as early as 21 months of age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of a trial sequence and the four conditions introduced in Experiment 1. Prime–Target, I saw a cat … dog; Prime–Look, I saw a cat … look; Neutral–Target, I saw a swing … dog; Neutral–Target, I saw a swing … look.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean (±1s.e.) PTL measure (T/T+D) in Experiment 1 by Age and Condition. Central line indicates looking at chance level. Dotted lines indicate significant differences between conditions (**p < 0.01). Target looking above chance (**p < 0.01).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean (±1 s.e.) PTL measure (T/T+D) in Experiment 2 by Condition. Central line indicates looking at chance level. Dotted lines indicate significant differences between conditions (**p < 0.01). Target looking above chance (**p < 0.01).

References

    1. Alario F. X., Segui J., Ferrand L.2000Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A Human Exp. Psychol. 53A, 741–764 - PubMed
    1. Altmann G. T. M., Kamide Y.1999Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73, 247–264 (doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson J. E., Holcomb P. J.1995Auditory and visual semantic priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: an event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology 32, 177–190 (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03310.x) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arias-Trejo N., Plunkett K.Submitted Early associative and taxonomic priming effects. - PubMed
    1. Bajo M. T.1988Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 14, 579–589 (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.579) - DOI - PubMed