Involving American Indians and medically underserved rural populations in cancer clinical trials
- PMID: 19933720
- PMCID: PMC2891042
- DOI: 10.1177/1740774509348526
Involving American Indians and medically underserved rural populations in cancer clinical trials
Abstract
Purpose: To assess cancer clinical trial recruitment and reasons for nonaccrual among a rural, medically underserved population served by a community-based cancer care center.
Methods: We prospectively tracked clinical trial enrollment incidence among all new patients presenting at the Rapid City Regional Cancer Care Institute. Evaluating physicians completed questionnaires for each patient regarding clinical trial enrollment status and primary reasons for nonenrollment. Patients who identified as American Indian were referred to a program where patients were assisted in navigating the medical system by trained, culturally competent staff.
Results: Between September 2006 and January 2008, 891 new cancer patients were evaluated. Seventy-eight patients (9%; 95% confidence intervals, 7-11%) were enrolled on a clinical treatment trial. For 73% (95% confidence intervals, 69-75%) of patients (646 of 891) lack of relevant protocol availability or protocol inclusion criteria restrictiveness was the reason for nonenrollment. Only 45 (5%; 95% confidence intervals, 4-7%) patients refused enrollment on a trial. Of the 78 enrolled on a trial, 6 (8%; 95% confidence intervals, 3-16%) were American Indian. Three additional American Indian patients were enrolled under a nontreatment cancer control trial, bringing the total percentage enrolled of the 94 American Indians who presented to the clinic to 10% (95% confidence intervals, 5-17%).
Limitations: Eligibility rates were unable to be calculated and cross validation of the number in the cohort via registries or ICD-9 codes was not performed.
Conclusion: Clinical trial participation in this medically underserved population was low overall, but approximately 3-fold higher than reported national accrual rates. Lack of availability of protocols for common cancer sites as well as stringent protocol inclusion criteria were the primary obstacles to clinical trial enrollment. Targeted interventions using a Patient Navigation program were used to engage AI patients and may have resulted in higher clinical trial enrollment among this racial/ethnic group.
Figures
Similar articles
-
State-of-the-science of patient navigation as a strategy for enhancing minority clinical trial accrual.Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1122-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28570. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24643650 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient navigation for American Indians undergoing cancer treatment: utilization and impact on care delivery in a regional healthcare center.Cancer. 2011 Jun 15;117(12):2754-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25823. Epub 2010 Dec 14. Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21656754 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):184-194. doi: 10.1177/1740774520901514. Epub 2020 Feb 3. Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 32009456 Free PMC article.
-
Case-linked analysis of clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center.Cancer. 2015 Dec 15;121(24):4398-406. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29669. Epub 2015 Sep 22. Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26393950 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Opportunities to Increase Science of Diversity and Inclusion in Clinical Trials: Equity and a Lack of a Control.J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 19;12(24):e030042. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030042. Epub 2023 Dec 18. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023. PMID: 38108253 Free PMC article. Review.
-
State-of-the-science of patient navigation as a strategy for enhancing minority clinical trial accrual.Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1122-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28570. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24643650 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: Identifying opportunities for intervention.Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):949-957. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32675. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31869454 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing Cancer Disparities Among American Indians through Innovative Technologies and Patient Navigation: The Walking Forward Experience.Front Oncol. 2011 Jun 22;1:11. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2011.00011. eCollection 2011. Front Oncol. 2011. PMID: 22649752 Free PMC article.
-
What do people really know and think about clinical trials? A comparison of rural and urban communities in the South.J Community Health. 2013 Aug;38(4):642-51. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9659-z. J Community Health. 2013. PMID: 23468319
References
-
- NIH Revitalization Act. Subtitle B. 1993:131–133.
-
- Sateren WB, Trimble EL, Abrams J, et al. How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2109–17. - PubMed
-
- Maurer LH, Davis T, Hammond S, et al. Clinical trials in a rural population: professional education aspects. J Cancer Educ. 2001;16:89–92. - PubMed
-
- Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291:2720–26. - PubMed
-
- Swanson GM, Bailar JC., 3rd Selection and description of cancer clinical trials participants–science or happenstance? Cancer. 2002;95:950–59. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical