Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20670-4.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907998106. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa

Affiliations

Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa

Marshall B Burke et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Armed conflict within nations has had disastrous humanitarian consequences throughout much of the world. Here we undertake the first comprehensive examination of the potential impact of global climate change on armed conflict in sub-Saharan Africa. We find strong historical linkages between civil war and temperature in Africa, with warmer years leading to significant increases in the likelihood of war. When combined with climate model projections of future temperature trends, this historical response to temperature suggests a roughly 54% increase in armed conflict incidence by 2030, or an additional 393,000 battle deaths if future wars are as deadly as recent wars. Our results suggest an urgent need to reform African governments' and foreign aid donors' policies to deal with rising temperatures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Projected changes in climate and conflict to 2030. (Left) Projected changes in climate to 2030 for 5 sub-Saharan Africa subregions and the region as a whole. Boxplots show the range of model ensemble projected changes for precipitation (% change, Top) and temperature (°C, Bottom), for 2020–2039 minus 1980–1999, based on the 18 models running the A1B scenario, with the dark vertical line representing the median, the colored boxes showing the interquartile range, and the whiskers indicating the extremes. (Right) Projected percentage point change in the incidence of civil war for the same period and regions, based the same climate model projections and a 10,000-run bootstrap of model 1 in Table 1. For each region, boxplot 1 represents projections including uncertainty in both climate model projections and in conflict response to climate, boxplot 2 represents uncertainty only in conflict response to climate, and boxplot 3 represents uncertainty only in climate projections. Dark vertical lines represent median projection, colored boxes show the interquartile range, and whiskers indicate the 5th–95th percentile of projections.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Projected percent changes in the incidence of civil war for all of sub-Saharan Africa, including both climate and conflict uncertainty as calculated as in Fig. 1. (Top) Projections based on alternative specifications of the relationship between climate and conflict, with other factors fixed. (Bottom) Projected combined effects of changes in climate, per capita income, and democracy. Dark vertical lines represent the median projection, colored boxes show the interquartile range, and whiskers indicate the 5th–95th percentile of projections, using climate projections from all climate models for the A1B scenario, such that each boxplot represents 180,000 projections. Each specification includes the variables listed on the left (contemporaneous and lagged for the climate variables) in addition to country time trends and country fixed effects.

Comment in

  • Climate robustly linked to African civil war.
    Burke MB, Miguel E, Satyanath S, Dykema JA, Lobell DB. Burke MB, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):E185; author reply E186-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014879107. Epub 2010 Nov 30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010. PMID: 21118990 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Concealing agreements over climate-conflict results.
    Buhaug H. Buhaug H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 11;111(6):E636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323773111. Epub 2014 Jan 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24429351 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Reconciling disagreement over climate-conflict results in Africa.
    Hsiang SM, Meng KC. Hsiang SM, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 11;111(6):2100-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316006111. Epub 2014 Jan 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24520173 Free PMC article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blattman C, Miguel E. Civil war. J Econ Lit. 2009 in press.
    1. Miguel E, Satyanath S, Sergenti E. Economic shocks and civil conflict: An instrumental variables approach. J Polit Econ. 2004;112:725–753.
    1. Lobell DB, et al. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science. 2008;319:607–610. - PubMed
    1. Nicholls RJ, Hoozemans FMJ, Marchand M. Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: Regional and global analyses. Global Environ Change. 1999;9:S69–S87.
    1. CNA Corp. National Security and the Threat of Climate Change. Alexandria, VA: CNA Corp; 2007.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources