Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 Dec;114(6):1189-1196.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c15064.

Role of second-trimester genetic sonography after Down syndrome screening

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Role of second-trimester genetic sonography after Down syndrome screening

Kjersti M Aagaard-Tillery et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of second-trimester genetic sonography in modifying Down syndrome screening test results.

Methods: The First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) aneuploidy screening trial participants were studied from 13 centers where a 15- to 23-week genetic sonogram was performed in the same center. Midtrimester Down syndrome risks were estimated for five screening test policies: first-trimester combined, second-trimester quadruple, and testing sequentially by integrated, stepwise, or contingent protocols. The maternal age-specific risk and the screening test risk were modified using likelihood ratios derived from the ultrasound findings. Separate likelihood ratios were obtained for the presence or absence of at least one major fetal structural malformation and for each "soft" sonographic marker statistically significant at the P<.005 level. Detection and false-positive rate were calculated for the genetic sonogram alone and for each test before and after risk modification.

Results: A total of 7,842 pregnancies were studied, including 59 with Down syndrome. Major malformations and 8 of the 18 soft markers evaluated were highly significant. The detection rate for a 5% false-positive rate for the genetic sonogram alone was 69%; the detection rate increased from 81% to 90% with the combined test, from 81% to 90% with the quadruple test, from 93% to 98% with the integrated test, from 97% to 98% with the stepwise test, and from 95% to 97% with the contingent test. The stepwise and contingent use of the genetic sonogram after first-trimester screening both yielded a 90% detection rate.

Conclusion: Genetic sonography can increase detection rates substantially for combined and quadruple tests and more modestly for sequential protocols. Substituting sonography for quadruple markers in sequential screening was not useful.

Level of evidence: II.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Smith-Bindman R, Hosmer W, Feldstein VA, Deeks JJ, Gold-berg JD. Second-trimester ultrasound to detect fetuses with Down syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285:1044–55. - PubMed
    1. Nyberg DA, Souter VL, El-Bastawissi A, Young S, Luthhardt F, Luthy DA. Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:1053–63. - PubMed
    1. Bromley B, Lieberman E, Shipp TD, Benacerraf BR. The genetic sonogram: a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second trimester. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:1087–96. - PubMed
    1. Nicolaides KH. Screening for chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:313–21. - PubMed
    1. Benacerraf BR, Neuberg D, Bromley B, Frigoletto FD., Jr Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11:449–58. - PubMed

Publication types