Cycle control with a 21-day compared with a 24-day oral contraceptive pill: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 19935020
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181beab47
Cycle control with a 21-day compared with a 24-day oral contraceptive pill: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare bleeding patterns between a 21/7-day triphasic norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol (E2) 25-microgram oral contraceptive pill (OCP) and a 24/4-day drospirenone/ethinyl E2 20-microgram OCP.
Methods: In a three-cycle, open-label, multicenter study, healthy, sexually active women were assigned randomly to a 21/7-day (norgestimate/ethinyl E2) or 24/4-day (drospirenone/ethinyl E2) OCP regimen. Randomization was stratified to assure a balanced distribution between regimens for "fresh starts" and "switchers." Bleeding data were collected daily using an interactive voice-response system. Bleeding was defined according to the 2007 U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Reproductive Health Drug Advisory Committee-endorsed criteria.
Results: Across the three cycles, the 21/7-day OCP group (n=165) reported fewer unscheduled bleeding days than did the 24/4-day OCP group (n=167) (mean 4.6 compared with 6.1 days, P=.003). Women using the 21/7-day OCP had significantly fewer episodes of unscheduled bleeding than did those using the 24/4-day OCP (mean 1.47 compared with 2.01, P=.001). Moreover, women using the 21/7-day OCP had a significantly lower absence of scheduled bleeding at each cycle (P<.001). Both regimens were well-tolerated.
Conclusion: A 21-day norgestimate/ethinyl E2 25-microgram regimen results in less unscheduled bleeding and more scheduled bleeding than does a 24-day drospirenone/ethinyl E2 20-microgram regimen.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00745901.
Level of evidence: I.
Comment in
-
Cycle control with a 21-day compared with a 24-day oral contraceptive pill: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;115(4):866-867. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d70144. Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20308851 No abstract available.
-
Cycle control with a 21-day compared with a 24-day oral contraceptive pill: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;115(4):867. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d70303. Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20308855 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Combined hormonal contraception in cycles artificially extended].Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2010 Jan;78(1):37-45. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2010. PMID: 20931801 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
Pooled analysis of two randomized, open-label studies comparing the effects of nomegestrol acetate/17β-estradiol and drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol on bleeding patterns in healthy women.Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):390-397. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 20. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 28011288 Clinical Trial.
-
Cycle control with triphasic norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol, a new oral contraceptive agent.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1992;156:22-6. doi: 10.3109/00016349209156511. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1992. PMID: 1324553 Clinical Trial.
-
Expert opinion on a flexible extended regimen of drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Oct;15(14):2071-9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2014.949237. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014. PMID: 25186109 Review.
-
[Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):415-25. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923832 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Extended regimen combined oral contraception: A review of evolving concepts and acceptance by women and clinicians.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(2):106-15. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1107894. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016. PMID: 26572318 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD003553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003553.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 22071807 Free PMC article.
-
20 µg versus >20 µg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1;2013(8):CD003989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003989.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23904209 Free PMC article.
-
Cycle control and bleeding pattern of a 24/4 regimen of drospirenone 3 mg/ethinylestradiol 20 μg compared with a 21/7 regimen of desogestrel 150 μg/ethinylestradiol 20 μg: a pooled analysis.Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(8):519-525. doi: 10.2165/11590260-000000000-00000. Clin Drug Investig. 2011. PMID: 21721590 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined hormonal contraceptives for heavy menstrual bleeding.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 11;2(2):CD000154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000154.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30742315 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blumenthal PD, Edelman A. Hormonal contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:670–84.
-
- Kaunitz AM. Clinical practice. Hormonal contraception in women of older reproductive age. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1262–70.
-
- Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Meehan TE. Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation. Contraception 1995;51:283–8.
-
- Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS. Oral contraceptive discontinuation. A prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:577–82.
-
- Sabatini R, Cagiano R. Comparison profiles of cycle control, side effects and sexual satisfaction of three hormonal contraceptives. Contraception 2006;74:220–3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials