Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery
- PMID: 19935024
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2
Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between cone depth of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) of the cervix and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.
Methods: The study included all deliveries in Denmark over a 9-year period, 1997-2005, with information obtained from various public health registries. Of the 552,678 singleton deliveries included in the study, 19,049 were preterm and 8,180 were subsequent to LEEP. Of the 8,180 deliveries with prior LEEP, 273 were subsequent to two or more LEEPs. Of the deliveries subsequent to only one LEEP, we extracted information about cone depth on 3,605 deliveries, of which 223 were preterm (6.2%). Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate association between cone characteristics and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery, with simultaneous adjustment for potential confounders.
Results: Increasing cone depth was associated with a significant increase in the risk of preterm delivery, with an estimated 6% increase in risk per each additional millimeter of tissue excised (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.09). Severity of the cone histology and time since LEEP were not associated with the risk of preterm delivery. Having had two or more LEEPs increased the risk almost fourfold for subsequent preterm delivery when compared with no LEEP before delivery, and almost doubled the risk when compared with one LEEP before delivery.
Conclusion: Increasing cone depth of LEEP is directly associated with an increasing risk of preterm delivery, even after adjustment for several confounding factors.
Level of evidence: II.
Similar articles
-
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):1063-1068. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828caa31. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23635744
-
Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and risk for spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies.Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):511-515. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b1377b. Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19701028
-
Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(5):596-603. doi: 10.1080/00016340701279145. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007. PMID: 17464590
-
[Prevention of obstetrical complications following LEEP, is it possible?].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014 Jan;43(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Dec 12. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014. PMID: 24332739 Review. French.
-
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure vs. Cold Knife Cone in Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Review of 447 Cases.Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017 Nov;47(6):663-667. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017. PMID: 29263039 Review.
Cited by
-
Screening adolescents and young women.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013 Jun;40(2):257-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Apr 17. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013. PMID: 23732030 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of cervical conization size with subsequent cervical length changes on preterm birth rates in asymptomatic singleton pregnancies.Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 5;11(1):19703. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99185-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34611206 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy and complication rates after local treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage 1a1 cervical cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis from the CIRCLE Group.BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e028008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028008. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31377697 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy, previous excisional treatment, cone-length and preterm delivery: a register-based study from western Sweden.BMC Med. 2022 Feb 22;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02276-6. BMC Med. 2022. PMID: 35189872 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2015 May 23;16:225. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26002493 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:489–98.
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cervix cancer screening. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention. Vol 10. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005.
-
- Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:325–32.
-
- Crane JM, Delaney T, Hutchens D. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:37–44.
-
- Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, Tamussino K, Haas J, Winter R. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:604–7.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials