Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

Affiliations

¹ James Lind Library, James Lind Initiative, Oxford, UK (Sir I Chalmers DSc); and Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (Prof P Glasziou RACGP).

Iain Chalmers et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec.

. 2009 Dec;114(6):1341-1345.

doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d.

¹ James Lind Library, James Lind Initiative, Oxford, UK (Sir I Chalmers DSc); and Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (Prof P Glasziou RACGP).

No abstract available

References

1. Liberati A. An unfinished trip through uncertainties. BMJ 2004;328:531.
1. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:MR000005.
1. Garattini S, Chalmers I. Patients and the public deserve big changes in evaluation of drugs. BMJ 2009;338:804–6.
1. Gross CP, Anderson GF, Powe NR. The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1914–5.
1. Stuckler D, King L, Robinson H, McKee M. WHO’s budgetary allocations and burden of disease: a comparative analysis. Lancet 2008;372:1563–9.