Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;18(4):485-9.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.209. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

Evaluation of the discriminative accuracy of genomic profiling in the prediction of common complex diseases

Affiliations

Evaluation of the discriminative accuracy of genomic profiling in the prediction of common complex diseases

Ramal Moonesinghe et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Genetic testing for susceptibility to common diseases based on a combination of genetic markers may be needed because the effect size associated with each genetic marker is small. Whether or not a genome profile based on a combination of markers could yield a useful test can be evaluated by assessing the discriminative accuracy. The authors present a simple method to calculate the clinical discriminative accuracy of a genomic profile when the relative risk and genotype frequency of each genotype are known. In addition, the clinical discriminative accuracy of a genetic test is presented for given values of the heritability and prevalence of the disease and for the population-attributable fraction of the combined genetic markers. For given values of relative risk and genotype frequency, the discriminative accuracy increases with increasing heritability but declines with increasing prevalence of the disease. For a given value of population-attributable fraction, the discriminative accuracy increases with increasing relative risks, but declines with increasing genotype frequency. On the basis of population-attributable fraction and estimates of heritability of disease, the number of risk genotypes required to have a reasonable clinical discriminative accuracy is much higher than the genome profiles available at present.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for genotype frequency (G) equal to 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3, and relative risks (R) equal to 1.1, 1.3 and 1.5, for 40 markers (AUC_1) and 80 markers (AUC_2).

References

    1. Morris JK, Wald NJ. Graphical presentation of distributions of risk in screening. J Med Screen. 2005;12:155–160. - PubMed
    1. Zhen Z, Yu Y, Berchuck A, et al. Combining multiple serum tumor markers improves detection of stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:526–531. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wald NJ, Morris JK, Rish S. The efficacy of combining several risk factors as a screening test. J Med Screen. 2005;12:197–201. - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP. Genetic associations: false or true. Trends Mol Med. 2003;9:135–138. - PubMed
    1. Khoury MJ, Yang Q, Gwinn M, Little J, Flanders WD. An epidemiologic assessment of genomic profiling for measuring susceptibility to common diseases and targeting interventions. Genet Med. 2004;6:38–47. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances