Effects of genital ulcer disease and herpes simplex virus type 2 on the efficacy of male circumcision for HIV prevention: Analyses from the Rakai trials
- PMID: 19936044
- PMCID: PMC2771764
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000187
Effects of genital ulcer disease and herpes simplex virus type 2 on the efficacy of male circumcision for HIV prevention: Analyses from the Rakai trials
Abstract
Background: Randomized trials show that male circumcision (MC) reduces the incidence of HIV and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infections, and symptomatic genital ulcer disease (GUD). We assessed the role of GUD and HSV-2 in the protection against HIV afforded by MC.
Methods and findings: HIV-uninfected men were randomized to immediate (n = 2,756) or delayed MC (n = 2,775) in two randomized trials in Rakai, Uganda. GUD symptoms, HSV-2 status, and HIV acquisition were determined at enrollment and at 6, 12, and 24 mo of follow up. Ulcer etiology was assessed by PCR. We estimated the prevalence and prevalence risk ratios (PRRs) of GUD in circumcised versus uncircumcised men and assessed the effects of HSV-2 serostatus as a risk-modifying factor for GUD. We estimated the proportion of the effect of MC on HIV acquisition that was mediated by symptomatic GUD, and by HSV-2 infection. Circumcision significantly reduced symptomatic GUD in HSV-2-seronegative men (PRR = 0.51, 95% [confidence interval] CI 0.43-0.74), HSV-2-seropositive men (PRR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.69), and in HSV-2 seroconverters (PRR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.79). The proportion of acute ulcers due to HSV-2 detected by PCR was 48.0% in circumcised men and 39.3% in uncircumcised men (chi(2)p = 0.62). Circumcision reduced the risk of HIV acquisition in HSV-2 seronegative men (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.81), and potentially in HSV-2 seroconverters (IRR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.19-1.57; not significant), but not in men with prevalent HSV-2 at enrollment (IRR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.49-1.60). The proportion of reduced HIV acquisition in circumcised men mediated by reductions in symptomatic GUD was 11.2% (95% CI 5.0-38.0), and the proportion mediated by reduced HSV-2 incidence was 8.6% (95% CI -1.2 to 77.1).
Conclusions: Circumcision reduced GUD irrespective of HSV-2 status, but this reduction played only a modest role in the protective effect of circumcision on HIV acquisition.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00124878 NCT00425984.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Circumcision status and incident herpes simplex virus type 2 infection, genital ulcer disease, and HIV infection.AIDS. 2012 Jun 1;26(9):1141-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328352d116. AIDS. 2012. PMID: 22382150 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Medical male circumcision and herpes simplex virus 2 acquisition: posttrial surveillance in Kisumu, Kenya.J Infect Dis. 2013 Dec 1;208(11):1869-76. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit371. Epub 2013 Jul 30. J Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23901089 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Aetiology of genital ulcer disease in female partners of male participants in a circumcision trial in Uganda.Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Sep;20(9):650-1. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009067. Int J STD AIDS. 2009. PMID: 19710342 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Estimated global and regional incidence and prevalence of herpes simplex virus infections and genital ulcer disease in 2020: mathematical modelling analyses.Sex Transm Infect. 2025 May 19;101(4):214-223. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056307. Sex Transm Infect. 2025. PMID: 39658199 Free PMC article.
-
Soap and water prophylaxis for limiting genital ulcer disease and HIV-1 infection in men in sub-Saharan Africa.Genitourin Med. 1993 Aug;69(4):297-300. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.4.297. Genitourin Med. 1993. PMID: 7721293 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Feb;12(2):E76-E99. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5033. Epub 2017 Dec 1. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018. PMID: 29381458 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Does Male Circumcision Protect against Sexually Transmitted Infections? Arguments and Meta-Analyses to the Contrary Fail to Withstand Scrutiny.ISRN Urol. 2014 May 13;2014:684706. doi: 10.1155/2014/684706. eCollection 2014. ISRN Urol. 2014. PMID: 24944836 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The 30-year war on AIDS: have we reached the tipping point?Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Dec;38(12):1089-93. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182387ad6. Sex Transm Dis. 2011. PMID: 22082717 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The biology of how circumcision reduces HIV susceptibility: broader implications for the prevention field.AIDS Res Ther. 2017 Sep 12;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12981-017-0167-6. AIDS Res Ther. 2017. PMID: 28893286 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Foreskin surface area is not associated with sub-preputial microbiome composition or penile cytokines.PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0234256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234256. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32574173 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:643–656. - PubMed
-
- Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;369:657–666. - PubMed
-
- Weiss HA, Quigley MA, Hayes RJ. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aids. 2000;14:2361–2370. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical