Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):397-403.
doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000500009.

Evaluation of the Family Impact Scale for use in Brazil

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Family Impact Scale for use in Brazil

Taís de Souza Barbosa et al. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the validity and reliability of the Family Impact Scale (FIS) applied in Brazilian parents after translations and cultural adaptations to Brazilian Portuguese language and to evaluate the nature and extent to which the family functioning is compromised by the child oral conditions.

Material and methods: Parents were recruited from general populations for pre-testing (n=20), validity (n=210) and test-retest reliability (n=20) studies. The children were examined for dental caries, gingivitis, fluorosis and malocclusion.

Results: The FIS discriminated among the categories of malocclusion and showed good construct validity. The Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. Almost 20% of the informants reported some family impact ;sometimes' or ;often/everyday' from the child's oral condition. Impact on FIS domains of this frequency ranged from 13.8% for financial difficulties to 24.4% for parental or family activities.

Conclusions: The Brazilian Portuguese version of FIS is valid and reliable. The results suggest that child oral conditions have a negative impact on the family. Further research is required, as these findings were based on cross-sectional study and convenience samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Distribution (%) of responses to the family impact items (n=210)

References

    1. ABEP - Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. [Internet] São Paulo: ABEP; c2009. [cited 2009 Jan 18]. Available from: http://www.abep.org.
    1. Barbosa TS, Tureli MC, Gaviao MB. Validity and reliability of the child perceptions questionnaires applied in brazilian children. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9:13–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997.
    1. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: the Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa: Iowa College of Dentistry, University of Iowa; 1986.
    1. Eiser C, Morse R. Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–157. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms