Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations
- PMID: 19936589
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1050-3
Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of the study was to reveal the way we treat vaginal mesh complications in a trained referral center.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical removal of transvaginal mesh for mesh-related complications during a 5-year period.
Results: Eighty-three patients underwent 104 operations including 61 complete mesh removal, 14 partial excision, 15 section of sub-urethral sling, and five laparoscopies. Main indications were erosion, infection, granuloma, incomplete voiding, and pain. Fifty-eight removals occurred more than 2 years after the primary mesh placement. Mean operation time was 21 min, and there were two intraoperative and ten minor postoperative complications. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) recurred in 38% and cystocele in 19% of patients.
Conclusions: In a trained center, mesh removal was found to be a quick and safe procedure. Mesh-related complications may frequently occur more than 2 years after the primary operation. Recurrence was mostly associated with SUI and less with genital prolapse.
Similar articles
-
Indications and Complications Associated with the Removal of 506 Pieces of Vaginal Mesh Used in Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct 26;29:185-189. Surg Technol Int. 2016. PMID: 27780347
-
Association Between the Amount of Vaginal Mesh Used With Mesh Erosions and Repeated Surgery After Repairing Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence.JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):257-263. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4200. JAMA Surg. 2017. PMID: 27902825
-
Functional outcomes of synthetic tape and mesh revision surgeries: a monocentric experience.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 May;30(5):805-813. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3727-y. Epub 2018 Aug 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30069725
-
Mesh Excision: Is Total Mesh Excision Necessary?Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Apr;17(4):34. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0590-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 26905696 Review.
-
Complications of vaginal mesh surgery.Curr Opin Urol. 2012 Jul;22(4):287-91. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835480b2. Curr Opin Urol. 2012. PMID: 22617058 Review.
Cited by
-
Mesh-related and intraoperative complications of pelvic organ prolapse repair.Cent European J Urol. 2014;67(3):296-301. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art17. Epub 2014 Aug 18. Cent European J Urol. 2014. PMID: 25247091 Free PMC article.
-
How to Deal with Bladder Stones Associated with Exposed Intravesical Mesh.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Apr 24;14(3):259-263. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_86_24. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025. PMID: 40786677 Free PMC article.
-
Computer modeling informs study design: vaginal estrogen to prevent mesh erosion after different routes of prolapse surgery.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Mar;24(3):441-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1877-x. Epub 2012 Jul 17. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22801937 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Sep;12(9):481-509. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.183. Epub 2015 Aug 18. Nat Rev Urol. 2015. PMID: 26282209 Review.
-
Risk factors for stress urinary incontinence recurrence after midurethral sling revision.Int J Urol. 2023 Nov;30(11):1008-1013. doi: 10.1111/iju.15248. Epub 2023 Jul 13. Int J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37439555 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Apr;19(4):467-71 - PubMed
-
- J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):564-9 - PubMed
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Sep-Oct;16(5):389-94 - PubMed
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Sep;18(9):1059-64 - PubMed
-
- Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):891-8 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical