Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations
- PMID: 19936589
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1050-3
Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of the study was to reveal the way we treat vaginal mesh complications in a trained referral center.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical removal of transvaginal mesh for mesh-related complications during a 5-year period.
Results: Eighty-three patients underwent 104 operations including 61 complete mesh removal, 14 partial excision, 15 section of sub-urethral sling, and five laparoscopies. Main indications were erosion, infection, granuloma, incomplete voiding, and pain. Fifty-eight removals occurred more than 2 years after the primary mesh placement. Mean operation time was 21 min, and there were two intraoperative and ten minor postoperative complications. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) recurred in 38% and cystocele in 19% of patients.
Conclusions: In a trained center, mesh removal was found to be a quick and safe procedure. Mesh-related complications may frequently occur more than 2 years after the primary operation. Recurrence was mostly associated with SUI and less with genital prolapse.
References
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Apr;19(4):467-71 - PubMed
-
- J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):564-9 - PubMed
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Sep-Oct;16(5):389-94 - PubMed
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Sep;18(9):1059-64 - PubMed
-
- Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):891-8 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
