Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;19(1):125-36.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9560-5. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms

Seung W Choi et al. Qual Life Res. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Short-form patient-reported outcome measures are popular because they minimize patient burden. We assessed the efficiency of static short forms and computer adaptive testing (CAT) using data from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project.

Methods: We evaluated the 28-item PROMIS depressive symptoms bank. We used post hoc simulations based on the PROMIS calibration sample to compare several short-form selection strategies and the PROMIS CAT to the total item bank score.

Results: Compared with full-bank scores, all short forms and CAT produced highly correlated scores, but CAT outperformed each static short form in almost all criteria. However, short-form selection strategies performed only marginally worse than CAT. The performance gap observed in static forms was reduced by using a two-stage branching test format.

Conclusions: Using several polytomous items in a calibrated unidimensional bank to measure depressive symptoms yielded a CAT that provided marginally superior efficiency compared to static short forms. The efficiency of a two-stage semi-adaptive testing strategy was so close to CAT that it warrants further consideration and study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scale (Bank) information function (the outmost curve) and maximum attainable information curves (the inner curves)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation with the full-bank theta estimates as a function of test length (1 through 28 items)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean posterior standard deviation (PSD) as a function of test length (4 through 12 items)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Item response functions for the locator question, “I felt depressed”
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Root mean squared error (RMSE) of theta estimates at selected theta points. Note: the RMSEs were generated based on 1,000 simulees at each theta location

References

    1. Bjorner JB, Chang CH, Thissen D, Reeve BB. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16(Suppl 1):95–108. - PubMed
    1. Thissen D, Reeve BB, Bjorner JB, Chang CH. Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16(Suppl 1):109–119. - PubMed
    1. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belov DI, Armstrong RD. A Monte Carlo approach to the design, assembly, and evaluation of multistage adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2008;32(2):119–137.
    1. Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Reise SP, Stover AM, Riley WT, Cella D. The development of scales for emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Depression, Anxiety, and Anger. in preparation. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types