Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms
- PMID: 19941077
- PMCID: PMC2832176
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9560-5
Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms
Abstract
Purpose: Short-form patient-reported outcome measures are popular because they minimize patient burden. We assessed the efficiency of static short forms and computer adaptive testing (CAT) using data from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project.
Methods: We evaluated the 28-item PROMIS depressive symptoms bank. We used post hoc simulations based on the PROMIS calibration sample to compare several short-form selection strategies and the PROMIS CAT to the total item bank score.
Results: Compared with full-bank scores, all short forms and CAT produced highly correlated scores, but CAT outperformed each static short form in almost all criteria. However, short-form selection strategies performed only marginally worse than CAT. The performance gap observed in static forms was reduced by using a two-stage branching test format.
Conclusions: Using several polytomous items in a calibrated unidimensional bank to measure depressive symptoms yielded a CAT that provided marginally superior efficiency compared to static short forms. The efficiency of a two-stage semi-adaptive testing strategy was so close to CAT that it warrants further consideration and study.
Figures
References
-
- Bjorner JB, Chang CH, Thissen D, Reeve BB. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16(Suppl 1):95–108. - PubMed
-
- Thissen D, Reeve BB, Bjorner JB, Chang CH. Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16(Suppl 1):109–119. - PubMed
-
- Belov DI, Armstrong RD. A Monte Carlo approach to the design, assembly, and evaluation of multistage adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2008;32(2):119–137.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- U01AR52155/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052170/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052181/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52170/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52158/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52171/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052155/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52186/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U-01 AR 052177-04/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052171/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052186/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052177/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52177/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52181/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052158/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
