Interacting effects of predation risk and signal patchiness on activity and communication in house mice
- PMID: 19941627
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01630.x
Interacting effects of predation risk and signal patchiness on activity and communication in house mice
Abstract
1. Social signalling can be risky when signals are open to exploitation by eavesdropping predators. Unlike other signal modalities, olfactory signals cannot be 'switched off' in the presence of an eavesdropping predator, leaving receivers of scent signals at an increased risk of predation long after the signaller has moved on. Yet individuals of some olfactorily communicating species appear unwilling to forego the receiving of signals under an increased risk of predation. Foraging theory predicts that predation risk can operate at multiple spatial scales, however, such that prey behaviour should be sensitive to the broader olfactory environment beyond the risks of a single point source of odour. 2. Here, we use the house mouse Mus domesticus to test whether the spatial distribution and overall level of receiving activity varies with the spatial distribution of conspecific scent signals and the risks posed by an eavesdropping predator, the cat Felis catus. We assessed the mice's responses to these risks using overall visitation, activity and scent marking rates at conspecific scented locations (in clumped, random or regular distributions) and the surrounding matrix (non-scented) locations with and without a predator cue (cat urine). We then used univariate and bivariate spatial point pattern analyses to assess behavioural responses (activity) to both treatments across a range of spatial scales. 3. Visitation, activity and scent marking rates were not affected by the predator cue or the spatial distribution of scents. But these non-significant results masked a fine scale anti-predatory response. Mouse activity was significantly more clustered at small scales when in the presence of the predator cue; this response held across all spatial distribution treatments. Mice were also sensitive to the predation risks of clumped scents, and dispersed their activity at intermediate scales significantly more when exposed to the predator cue, than in the control scent treatment. 4. These results suggest that olfactorily communicating species use scale-sensitive anti-predatory behavioural changes to compensate for their increased risks of predation when receiving scent signals. We highlight the importance of examining a variety of scales when investigating predator-prey interactions, and discuss the implications of these findings for behaviourally responsive predators and prey.
Similar articles
-
Predators are attracted to the olfactory signals of prey.PLoS One. 2010 Sep 30;5(9):e13114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013114. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20927352 Free PMC article.
-
Receiving behaviour is sensitive to risks from eavesdropping predators.Oecologia. 2009 Jun;160(3):609-17. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1320-2. Epub 2009 Apr 12. Oecologia. 2009. PMID: 19363623
-
Predator odours attract other predators, creating an olfactory web of information.Biol Lett. 2016 May;12(5):20151053. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.1053. Biol Lett. 2016. PMID: 27194283 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Cat Odor on Reproductive Behavior and Physiology in the House Mouse: (Mus Musculus).In: Mucignat-Caretta C, editor. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2014. Chapter 14. In: Mucignat-Caretta C, editor. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2014. Chapter 14. PMID: 24830030 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Dangerous liaisons: the predation risks of receiving social signals.Ecol Lett. 2012 Nov;15(11):1326-1339. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01856.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Ecol Lett. 2012. PMID: 22925009 Review.
Cited by
-
The Spatial Distribution of the House Mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, in Multi-Family Dwellings.Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;12(2):197. doi: 10.3390/ani12020197. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35049819 Free PMC article.
-
State-dependent foraging: lactating voles adjust their foraging behavior according to the presence of a potential nest predator and season.Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69(5):747-754. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1889-x. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015. PMID: 25926712 Free PMC article.
-
Odour cues influence predation risk at artificial bat roosts in urban bushland.Biol Lett. 2013 May 1;9(3):20121144. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1144. Print 2013 Jun 23. Biol Lett. 2013. PMID: 23637390 Free PMC article.
-
Exploiting olfactory learning in alien rats to protect birds' eggs.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 20;109(47):19304-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210981109. Epub 2012 Oct 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 23071301 Free PMC article.
-
Predators are attracted to the olfactory signals of prey.PLoS One. 2010 Sep 30;5(9):e13114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013114. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20927352 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous