. 2009 Sep;31(9):827-840.

doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34301-8.

The attitudes of Canadian maternity care practitioners towards labour and birth: many differences but important similarities

Michael C Klein¹, Janusz Kaczorowski², Wendy A Hall³, William Fraser⁴, Robert M Liston⁵, Sahba Eftekhary⁶, Rollin Brant⁷, Louise C Mâsse⁸, Jessica Rosinski⁹, Azar Mehrabadi¹⁰, Nazli Baradaran¹¹, Jocelyn Tomkinson¹¹, Sharon Dore¹², Patricia C McNiven¹³, Lee Saxell¹⁴, Kathie Lindstrom¹⁵, Jalana Grant¹⁶, Aoife Chamberlaine¹⁷

Affiliations

¹ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
² Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
³ School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁴ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Montréal, Montreal QC.
⁵ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁶ Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Government of Ontario, Toronto ON.
⁷ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁸ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁹ Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
¹⁰ School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
¹¹ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
¹² Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton ON.
¹³ Midwifery Education Program, Department of Family Practice, McMaster University, Hamilton ON.
¹⁴ Department of Midwifery, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre and St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver BC.
¹⁵ Perinatal Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Douglas College, New Westminster BC.
¹⁶ South Community Birth Program, Vancouver BC.
¹⁷ Midwifery Education Program, Ryerson University, Toronto ON.

PMID: 19941707
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34301-8

The attitudes of Canadian maternity care practitioners towards labour and birth: many differences but important similarities

Michael C Klein et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Sep.

. 2009 Sep;31(9):827-840.

doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34301-8.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
² Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
³ School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁴ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Montréal, Montreal QC.
⁵ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁶ Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Government of Ontario, Toronto ON.
⁷ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁸ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
⁹ Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
¹⁰ School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
¹¹ Developmental Neuroscience and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
¹² Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton ON.
¹³ Midwifery Education Program, Department of Family Practice, McMaster University, Hamilton ON.
¹⁴ Department of Midwifery, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre and St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver BC.
¹⁵ Perinatal Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Douglas College, New Westminster BC.
¹⁶ South Community Birth Program, Vancouver BC.
¹⁷ Midwifery Education Program, Ryerson University, Toronto ON.

PMID: 19941707
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34301-8

Abstract

Objective: Collaborative, interdisciplinary care models have the potential to improve maternity care. Differing attitudes of maternity care providers may impede this process. We sought to examine the attitudes of Canadian maternity care practitioners towards labour and birth.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional web- and paper-based survey of 549 obstetricians, 897 family physicians (400 antepartum only, 497 intrapartum), 545 nurses, 400 midwives, and 192 doulas.

Results: Participants responded to 43 Likert-type attitudinal questions. Nine themes were identified: electronic fetal monitoring, epidural analgesia, episiotomy, doula roles, Caesarean section benefits, factors decreasing Caesarean section rates, maternal choice, fear of vaginal birth, and safety of birth mode and place. Obstetrician scores reflected positive attitudes towards use of technology, in contrast to midwives' and doulas' scores. Family physicians providing only antenatal care had attitudinal scores similar to obstetricians; family physicians practising intrapartum care and nurses had intermediate scores on technology. Obstetricians' scores indicated that they had the least positive attitudes towards home birth, women's roles in their own births, and doula care, and they were the most concerned about the consequences of vaginal birth. Midwives' and doulas' scores reflected opposing views on these issues. Although 71% of obstetricians supported regulated midwifery, 88.9% were against home birth. Substantial numbers of each group held attitudes similar to dominant attitudes from other disciplines.

Conclusion: To develop effective team practice, efforts to reconcile differing attitudes towards labour and birth are needed. However, the overlap in attitudes between disciplines holds promise for a basis upon which to begin shared problem solving and collaboration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Cited by

Childbirth education and obstetric interventions among low-risk canadian women: is there a connection?
Stoll KH, Hall W. Stoll KH, et al. J Perinat Educ. 2012 Fall;21(4):229-37. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.4.229. J Perinat Educ. 2012. PMID: 23997551 Free PMC article.
The Canadian birth place study: examining maternity care provider attitudes and interprofessional conflict around planned home birth.
Vedam S, Stoll K, Schummers L, Fairbrother N, Klein MC, Thordarson D, Kornelsen J, Dharamsi S, Rogers J, Liston R, Kaczorowski J. Vedam S, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 28;14:353. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-353. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25352366 Free PMC article.
The facilitating factors and barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanized birth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliated hospital.
Behruzi R, Hatem M, Goulet L, Fraser W. Behruzi R, et al. BMC Womens Health. 2011 Nov 25;11:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-53. BMC Womens Health. 2011. PMID: 22114870 Free PMC article.
Demonstration of the application of the global cesarean section rate model (C-Model) and the Robson Classification to estimate and characterize excess numbers of institutional c-sections.
Zuleta-Tobón JJ. Zuleta-Tobón JJ. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021 Dec 30;72(4):396-406. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3649. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021. PMID: 35134286 Free PMC article. English, Spanish.
Mix of Maternity Care Providers in Canada.
Guliani H. Guliani H. Healthc Policy. 2015 Aug;11(1):46-60. Healthc Policy. 2015. PMID: 26571468 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Grants and funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Canada

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- ClinicalKey
- Elsevier Science
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

The attitudes of Canadian maternity care practitioners towards labour and birth: many differences but important similarities

Affiliations

The attitudes of Canadian maternity care practitioners towards labour and birth: many differences but important similarities

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Medical

Abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Medical