Blinded sample size recalculation for clinical trials with normal data and baseline adjusted analysis
- PMID: 19943322
- DOI: 10.1002/pst.398
Blinded sample size recalculation for clinical trials with normal data and baseline adjusted analysis
Abstract
Baseline adjusted analyses are commonly encountered in practice, and regulatory guidelines endorse this practice. Sample size calculations for this kind of analyses require knowledge of the magnitude of nuisance parameters that are usually not given when the results of clinical trials are reported in the literature. It is therefore quite natural to start with a preliminary calculated sample size based on the sparse information available in the planning phase and to re-estimate the value of the nuisance parameters (and with it the sample size) when a portion of the planned number of patients have completed the study. We investigate the characteristics of this internal pilot study design when an analysis of covariance with normally distributed outcome and one random covariate is applied. For this purpose we first assess the accuracy of four approximate sample size formulae within the fixed sample size design. Then the performance of the recalculation procedure with respect to its actual Type I error rate and power characteristics is examined. The results of simulation studies show that this approach has favorable properties with respect to the Type I error rate and power. Together with its simplicity, these features should make it attractive for practical application.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Blinded sample size recalculation in multicentre trials with normally distributed outcome.Biom J. 2010 Jun;52(3):377-99. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900114. Biom J. 2010. PMID: 20394080
-
Blinded sample size reassessment in non-inferiority and equivalence trials.Stat Med. 2003 Mar 30;22(6):995-1007. doi: 10.1002/sim.1456. Stat Med. 2003. PMID: 12627414
-
Simple procedures for blinded sample size adjustment that do not affect the type I error rate.Stat Med. 2003 Dec 15;22(23):3571-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.1585. Stat Med. 2003. PMID: 14652861
-
Sample size estimation: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trial designs.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):e141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.021. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21967951 Review.
-
Sample size recalculation in internal pilot study designs: a review.Biom J. 2006 Aug;48(4):537-55. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200510238. Biom J. 2006. PMID: 16972704 Review.
Cited by
-
Balance Training With Vibrotactile Neurofeedback and Ginkgo Biloba Extract in Age-Related Vertigo.Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 30;12:691917. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.691917. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 34917009 Free PMC article.
-
More efficient and inclusive time-to-event trials with covariate adjustment: a simulation study.Trials. 2023 Jun 6;24(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07375-0. Trials. 2023. PMID: 37280655 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunities.Trials. 2012 Aug 23;13:145. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-145. Trials. 2012. PMID: 22917111 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guava (Psidium guajava) Fruit Extract Prepared by Supercritical CO2 Extraction Inhibits Intestinal Glucose Resorption in a Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Study.Nutrients. 2019 Jul 3;11(7):1512. doi: 10.3390/nu11071512. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31277259 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
GABA Analogue HSK16149 in Chinese Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425614. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25614. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39158916 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical