[Ectopic pregnancy rupture--can it be prevented?]
- PMID: 19943536
[Ectopic pregnancy rupture--can it be prevented?]
Abstract
Objectives: To determine risk factors for ectopic pregnancy (EP) rupture based on the patients history and preoperative tests.
Materials and methods: The retrospective study consisted of 175 women operated on due to EP in the Department of Gynecology and Oncology of the Jagiellonian University between 2000-2008. Tubal rupture was diagnosed at the time of surgery. The patients were then divided into three groups: those who had unruptured EP without bleeding, those who had unruptured EP with hemorrhage into peritoneal cavity and those who suffered ruptured tubal pregnancy Analysis was performed based on the following parameters: patient history preoperative laboratory tests (Hb, Hct, betaHCG), and ultrasound exam.
Results: Of the 175 cases of ectopic pregnancy included in the study 20% were unruptured without bleeding (A) and 40.6% unruptured with hemorrhage (B) while 39.4% were ruptured (C). There was a positive correlation between the diameter of the tubal lesion measured ultrasonographically and rupture (37.4 +/- 16 for C vs 29.7 +/- 12.9 for A; p=0.04). The gestational age of the groups differed significantly (p=0,001): C (56 +/- 1), A (49 +/- 3), and B (42 +/- 2). There was also a positive correlation between rupture and gravidity (1 +/- 1 for A vs 2 +/- 2 for C; p=0.02). Moreover a positive correlation of borderline significance was discerned between rupture and parity (p=0.06). Additionally the preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values were significantly lower in the rupture group (p=0.001). There was no significant difference among the three groups in age, number of abortions, serum betaHCG, endometrial thickness, length of hospital stay or the time elapsed since the most recent pregnancy.
Conclusions: Low hemoglobin and hematocrit values, together with higher gravidity at the time of admission, may indicate an increased risk of tubal rupture.
Similar articles
-
Ruptured ectopic pregnancy: risk factors for a life-threatening condition.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 May;279(5):621-3. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0772-7. Epub 2008 Sep 2. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 18762959
-
Tubal rupture in ectopic pregnancy: is it predictable?Minerva Ginecol. 2015 Feb;67(1):13-9. Minerva Ginecol. 2015. PMID: 25660430
-
A study of risk factors for ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy.J Womens Health. 1998 May;7(4):459-63. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.459. J Womens Health. 1998. PMID: 9611704
-
Spontaneous ruptured and intact bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy.East Mediterr Health J. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):972-4. East Mediterr Health J. 2007. PMID: 17955781 Review. No abstract available.
-
Bilateral tubal pregnancies after tubal sterilization in a human immunodeficiency virus seropositive woman.J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Nov;85(11):1236-9. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002. PMID: 12546323 Review.
Cited by
-
Ruptured ectopic pregnancy diagnosed with computed tomography.Pol J Radiol. 2010 Oct;75(4):44-6. Pol J Radiol. 2010. PMID: 22802804 Free PMC article.
-
Coexistence of a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and cervical cancer: how to avoid a diagnostic error when the same symptoms present two different diagnoses.Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2021;25(4):295-297. doi: 10.5114/wo.2021.112166. Epub 2022 Jan 4. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2021. PMID: 35079238 Free PMC article.