A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study
- PMID: 19943593
- DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680439
A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study
Abstract
Background and objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the utility of a laparoscopic approach in the management of patients with right lower abdominal pain and in the quality of life after the operation.
Methods: Patients with suspected appendicitis were included in the study. They were randomly assigned either to treatment with a traditional open approach or with a laparoscopic approach. The patients' data, including demographic data, complications and gastro-intestinal quality of life index scores, were collected at the 6th week and 6th month and compared between the groups.
Results: Overall, 83 appendectomies were performed. Other pathologies were ovulation bleeding, ovarian cyst, Meckel's diverticulum, ectopic pregnancy and leiomyoma of the uterus. Negative appendectomy rate was 7%. Severe infection occurred in five of the open group. The advantages of the laparoscopy also showed significantly in hospital stay (55.80 +/- 20.97 hours vs. 75.06 +/- 35.14 hours), the need for narcotics and in visual analog score, as well as in the gastrointestinal quality of life index (85.88 +/- 9.73 vs 101.30 +/- 9.31). The quality of life is still better in the long-term (95.14 +/- 8.45 vs 120.36 +/- 10.25). When the groups were compared according to the subgroups of gastro-intestinal quality of life index, except for disease-specific items, in all categories a significant improvement was seen in the laparoscopically treated patients. This improvement was observed in the follow-up period also. However, the hospital costs (987.50 +/- 77.25 USD vs. 406.27 +/- 100.59 USD) and operative time (56.25 +/- 10.9 vs. 49.41 +/- 11.76 minutes) still continued to be a problem for the laparoscopic group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe method, which also has advantages of diagnostic procedure for other pathologies, a better quality of life both in the early and late period, and a short hospital stay. The important advantage is also seen in the late period with better quality of life.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016 Jul-Sept.;14(55):244-248. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016. PMID: 28814687
-
Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 May;19(3):200-4. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.58234. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013. PMID: 23720105 Clinical Trial.
-
A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.Am J Surg. 1996 May;171(5):533-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00022-0. Am J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8651403
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15095081 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 21047410 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30484855 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery.World J Surg. 2016 Feb;40(2):267-76. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3292-1. World J Surg. 2016. PMID: 26573174 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy.Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1470-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8889. Epub 2012 Sep 21. Br J Surg. 2012. PMID: 23001791 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):225-6. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.82571. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21727725 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical