A goal-oriented framework for specifying clinical guidelines and handling medical errors
- PMID: 19944779
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.11.006
A goal-oriented framework for specifying clinical guidelines and handling medical errors
Abstract
Computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) aim to improve patient care and reduce medical errors. Although CIGs implement evidence-based recommendations they cannot prevent exceptional behavior from happening. To address this problem we developed a framework that can monitor, detect, and handle exceptions that occur during normal CIG execution and can potentially prevent them from developing into medical errors. Our framework enables specifying the goals of a guideline and linking them with recommended tasks that could satisfy the goals. Exceptions are linked with goals that manage them, which can be realized by tasks or plans. To achieve a link between the tasks, plans, goals, monitored effects, and exceptions, our definition of goals and exceptions is state-based. We demonstrate our approach using a generic plan for management of a chronic disease and a particular instantiation for hypertension management.
2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.J Biomed Inform. 2013 Aug;46(4):744-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 25. J Biomed Inform. 2013. PMID: 23806274 Review.
-
Toward a representation format for sharable clinical guidelines.J Biomed Inform. 2001 Jun;34(3):157-69. doi: 10.1006/jbin.2001.1019. J Biomed Inform. 2001. PMID: 11723698
-
Handling expressiveness and comprehensibility requirements in GLIF3.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):241-5. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001. PMID: 11604741
-
Computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Where are we and where are we going ?Yearb Med Inform. 2006:145-58. Yearb Med Inform. 2006. PMID: 17051309 Review.
-
Patterns for collaborative work in health care teams.Artif Intell Med. 2011 Nov;53(3):139-60. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 7. Artif Intell Med. 2011. PMID: 21899990
Cited by
-
Using Semantic Components to Represent Dynamics of an Interdisciplinary Healthcare Team in a Multi-Agent Decision Support System.J Med Syst. 2016 Feb;40(2):42. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0375-3. Epub 2015 Nov 21. J Med Syst. 2016. PMID: 26590980
-
Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):738-48. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000033. Epub 2011 Jul 1. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011. PMID: 21724740 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modeling Healthcare Processes Using Commitments: An Empirical Evaluation.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141202. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26539985 Free PMC article.
-
Critical factors influencing physicians' intention to use computerized clinical practice guidelines: an integrative model of activity theory and the technology acceptance model.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 16;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0241-3. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016. PMID: 26772169 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical error management training for midwifery students in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd.J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jan 28;10:33. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_834_20. eCollection 2021. J Educ Health Promot. 2021. PMID: 33688542 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources