Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 19945779
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.034
Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Background: The lack of standardized reporting of the complications of radical prostatectomy in the literature has made it difficult to compare incidences across institutions and across different surgical approaches.
Objective: To define comprehensively the incidence, severity, and timing of onset of medical and surgical complications of open retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LP) using a standardized reporting methodology to facilitate comparison.
Design, setting, and participants: Between January 1999 and June 2007, 4592 consecutive patients underwent RP or LP without prior radiation or hormonal therapy. Median follow-up was 36.9 mo (interquartile range: 20.3-60.6).
Intervention: Open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Measurements: All medical and surgical complications of radical prostatectomy were captured and graded according to the modified Clavien classification and classified by timing of onset.
Results and limitations: There were 612 medical complications in 467 patients (10.2%) and 1426 surgical complications in 925 patients (20.1%). The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for RP were 8.5% and 1.5% for medical and 11.4% and 4.9% for surgical complications, respectively. The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for LP were 14.2% and 2.3% for medical and 23.1% and 6.6% for surgical complications, respectively. On multivariate analysis, LP approach was associated with a higher incidence of any grade medical and surgical complications but a lower incidence of major surgical complications than RP. Six hundred fifty-two men (14.2%) visited the emergency department, and 240 men (5.2%) required readmission. The main limitation is the retrospective nature.
Conclusions: With standardized reporting, the incidence of some complications is higher than recognized in the literature. Although most complications are minor in severity, medical and surgical complications are observed in approximately 10% and 20% of patients, respectively. Accurate reporting of complications through a standardized methodology is essential for counseling patients regarding risk of complications, for identifying modifiable risk factors, and for facilitating comparison across institutions and approaches.
2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The modified Clavien system: a plea for a standardized reporting system for surgical complications.Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):387-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.020. Epub 2009 Dec 14. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 20022421 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002;5(4):285-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500605. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002. PMID: 12627213
-
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17936849
-
Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):363-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.032. Epub 2009 Nov 21. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 19944519
-
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality.Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.018. Epub 2006 Jan 31. Eur Urol. 2006. PMID: 16488072 Review.
-
Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques.Can J Urol. 2006 Feb;13 Suppl 1:56-61. Can J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16526984 Review.
Cited by
-
Grading complications after transurethral resection of prostate using modified Clavien classification system and predicting complications using the Charlson comorbidity index.Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Apr;45(2):347-54. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0399-x. Epub 2013 Feb 16. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013. PMID: 23417169
-
Predictive factors for prolonged hospital stay after retropubic radical prostatectomy in a high-volume teaching center.Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Nov-Dec;44(6):1089-1105. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0339. Int Braz J Urol. 2018. PMID: 30325597 Free PMC article.
-
Standardized follow-up program may reduce emergency room and urgent care visits for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Jul;8(7-8):E505-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1655. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014. PMID: 25132899 Free PMC article.
-
Bleeding after prostatectomy: endovascular management.Gland Surg. 2019 Apr;8(2):108-114. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.02.03. Gland Surg. 2019. PMID: 31183320 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of annual surgical caseload on the rates of in-hospital pneumonia and other in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy.Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0103-y. Epub 2011 Dec 13. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22160759
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical