Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;148(1):107-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Nov 28.

Long-lasting antinociceptive spinal effects in primates of the novel nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor agonist UFP-112

Affiliations

Long-lasting antinociceptive spinal effects in primates of the novel nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor agonist UFP-112

Eric Hu et al. Pain. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Chemical modifications of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide that result in increased potency and resistance to degradation have recently lead to the discovery of [(pF)Phe(4)Aib(7)Arg(14)Lys(15)]N/OFQ-NH(2) (UFP-112), a novel N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptor agonist. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacological profile of intrathecally administered UFP-112 in monkeys under different behavioral assays. Intrathecal UFP-112 (1-10 nmol) dose-dependently produced antinociception against an acute noxious stimulus (50 degrees C water) and capsaicin-induced thermal hyperalgesia. Intrathecal UFP-112-induced antinociception could be reversed by a NOP receptor antagonist, J-113397 (0.1mg/kg), but not by a classic opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone (0.03 mg/kg). Like intrathecal morphine, UFP-112 produced antinociception in two primate pain models with a similar magnitude of effectiveness and a similar duration of action that last for 4-5h. Unlike intrathecal morphine, UFP-112 did not produce itch/scratching responses. In addition, intrathecal inactive doses of UFP-112 and morphine produced significant antinociceptive effects when given in combination without increasing scratching responses. These results demonstrated that intrathecal UFP-112 produced long-lasting morphine-comparable antinociceptive effects without potential itch side effect. This study is the first to provide functional evidence that selective NOP receptor agonists such as UFP-112 alone or in conjunction with morphine may improve the quality of spinal analgesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of behavioral effects produced by intrathecal administration of UFP-112 and morphine. Abscissas: time in hours after intrathecal administration. Ordinates: latency to withdraw the tail in 50 °C water (top panels) and scratches per 15 min (bottom panels). Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). Symbols represent different dosing conditions in the same monkeys. The asterisk represents a significant difference from the vehicle condition at corresponding time points (*p < 0.05).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of antagonists on intrathecal UFP-112 and morphine-induced antinociception in monkeys. The antagonist, either naltrexone (0.03 mg/kg) or J-113397 (0.1 mg/kg), was given subcutaneously 10 min after the 1-h time point. Abscissas: time in hours after intrathecal administration. Ordinates: latency to withdraw the tail in 50 °C water. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). Symbols represent effects with different post-injection conditions for the same monkeys. The asterisk represents a significant difference from the vehicle post-injection condition between time points 1.5 and 2.5 h (*p < 0.05).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Antinociceptive effects of intrathecally administered UFP-112 and morphine against capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia in 46 °C water. The agonist was given intrathecally 1 h before administration of capsaicin (0.1 mg/tail). Each data point was determined 15 min after capsaicin administration and represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). Symbols represent effects with different dosing conditions in the same monkeys. The asterisk represents a significant difference from the vehicle condition (*p < 0.05).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of durations of intrathecal UFP-112- and morphine-induced antihyperalgesia in 46 °C water. The antihyperalgesic effect of the agonist, either morphine (100 nmol) or UFP-112 (10 nmol), was determined by using a single dosing procedure. The agonist was given intrathecally at different time points before administration of capsaicin (0.1 mg/tail). Each data point was determined 15 min after capsaicin administration and represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). Symbols represent effects with different dosing conditions for the same monkeys. The asterisk represents a significant difference between morphine-treated condition and the vehicle condition (*p < 0.05). The symbol # represents a significant difference between UFP-112-treated condition and the vehicle condition (*p < 0.05).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Behavioral responses of intrathecally administered UFP-112 in combination with morphine. Effects of intrathecal morphine (3 nmol) or UFP-112 (1 nmol) alone were determined separately. Then effects of intrathecal administration of a mixture, i.e., 3 nmol of morphine combined with 1 nmol of UFP-112, were tested in the same monkeys. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). The asterisk represents a significant difference from the vehicle condition (*p < 0.05).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Effects of antagonists on antihyperalgesia by intrathecal combination of UFP-112 (1 nmol) and morphine (3 nmol) (i.e., a mixture). The antagonist, either naltrexone (0.03 mg/kg) or J-113397 (0.1 mg/kg), was given subcutaneously 30 min after intrathecal administration of a mixture. The symbol “+” indicates the corresponding compound was given. The symbol “−” indicates the corresponding was not given. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). The asterisk represents a significant difference from the vehicle condition (*p < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arduin M, Spagnolo B, Calo G, Guerrini R, Carra G, Fischetti C, Trapella C, Marzola E, McDonald J, Lambert DG, Regoli D, Salvadori S. Synthesis and biological activity of nociceptin/orphanin FQ analogues substituted in position 7 or 11 with Cα,α-dialkylated amino acids. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15:4434–43. - PubMed
    1. Bailey PL, Rhondeau S, Schafer PG, Lu JK, Timmins BS, Foster W, Pace NL, Stanley TH. Dose–response pharmacology of intrathecal morphine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:49–59. - PubMed
    1. Baraka A, Noueihid R, Hajj S. Intrathecal injection of morphine for obstetric analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:136–40. - PubMed
    1. Buerkle H, Yaksh TL. Comparison of the spinal actions of the mu-opioid remifentanil with alfentanil and morphine in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:94–102. - PubMed
    1. Butelman ER, Harris TJ, Kreek MJ. Antiallodynic effects of loperamide and fentanyl against topical capsaicin-induced allodynia in unanesthetized primates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;311:155–63. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms