Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication
- PMID: 19945947
- PMCID: PMC2802563
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1249
Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication
Abstract
Background: Given the rapid changes in the communication landscape brought about by participative Internet use and social media, it is important to develop a better understanding of these technologies and their impact on health communication. The first step in this effort is to identify the characteristics of current social media users. Up-to-date reporting of current social media use will help monitor the growth of social media and inform health promotion/communication efforts aiming to effectively utilize social media.
Objective: The purpose of the study is to identify the sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with current adult social media users in the United States.
Methods: Data came from the 2007 iteration of the Health Information National Trends Study (HINTS, N = 7674). HINTS is a nationally representative cross-sectional survey on health-related communication trends and practices. Survey respondents who reported having accessed the Internet (N = 5078) were asked whether, over the past year, they had (1) participated in an online support group, (2) written in a blog, (3) visited a social networking site. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of each type of social media use.
Results: Approximately 69% of US adults reported having access to the Internet in 2007. Among Internet users, 5% participated in an online support group, 7% reported blogging, and 23% used a social networking site. Multivariate analysis found that younger age was the only significant predictor of blogging and social networking site participation; a statistically significant linear relationship was observed, with younger categories reporting more frequent use. Younger age, poorer subjective health, and a personal cancer experience predicted support group participation. In general, social media are penetrating the US population independent of education, race/ethnicity, or health care access.
Conclusions: Recent growth of social media is not uniformly distributed across age groups; therefore, health communication programs utilizing social media must first consider the age of the targeted population to help ensure that messages reach the intended audience. While racial/ethnic and health status-related disparities exist in Internet access, among those with Internet access, these characteristics do not affect social media use. This finding suggests that the new technologies, represented by social media, may be changing the communication pattern throughout the United States.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS).J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jul 12;9(3):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e20. J Med Internet Res. 2007. PMID: 17627929 Free PMC article.
-
Health-related Internet use among cancer survivors: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003-2008.J Cancer Surviv. 2011 Sep;5(3):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0179-5. Epub 2011 Apr 20. J Cancer Surviv. 2011. PMID: 21505861
-
eHealth patient-provider communication in the United States: interest, inequalities, and predictors.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e18-e27. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw087. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27497797 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer Risk-Promoting Information: The Communication Environment of Young Adults.Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3S1):S63-S72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.025. Am J Prev Med. 2017. PMID: 28818248 Review.
-
Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS.gov).Med Ref Serv Q. 2021 Apr-Jun;40(2):215-223. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2021.1912575. Med Ref Serv Q. 2021. PMID: 33970822 Review.
Cited by
-
The Measles Vaccination Narrative in Twitter: A Quantitative Analysis.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Jan 4;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.5059. eCollection 2016 Jan-Jun. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016. PMID: 27227144 Free PMC article.
-
Preferred sources of health information in persons with multiple sclerosis: degree of trust and information sought.J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 17;15(4):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2466. J Med Internet Res. 2013. PMID: 23635393 Free PMC article.
-
Local health department use of twitter to disseminate diabetes information, United States.Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 May 2;10:E70. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120215. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013. PMID: 23639765 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling and Predicting eHealth Usage in Europe: A Multidimensional Approach From an Online Survey of 13,000 European Union Internet Users.J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 22;18(7):e188. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5605. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27450189 Free PMC article.
-
Seeking and receiving social support on Facebook for surgery.Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.038. Epub 2015 Feb 25. Soc Sci Med. 2015. PMID: 25753284 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jones S, Fox S. Generations online in 2009. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009. [2009-04-08]. 5kIf3zqjT http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Generations-Online-in-2009.aspx.
-
- Eysenbach Gunther. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030. http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e22/v10i3e22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vance K, Howe W, Dellavalle RP. Social internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(2):133–136, vi. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [2009-03-31]. Social Media at CDC http://cdc.gov/socialmedia/
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous