Mechanisms of interaction in speech production
- PMID: 19946622
- PMCID: PMC2782840
- DOI: 10.1080/01690960802299378
Mechanisms of interaction in speech production
Abstract
Many theories predict the presence of interactive effects involving information represented by distinct cognitive processes in speech production. There is considerably less agreement regarding the precise cognitive mechanisms that underlie these interactive effects. For example, are they driven by purely production-internal mechanisms (e.g., Dell, 1986) or do they reflect the influence of perceptual monitoring mechanisms on production processes (e.g., Roelofs, 2004)? Acoustic analyses reveal the phonetic realization of words is influenced by their word-specific properties-supporting the presence of interaction between lexical-level and phonetic information in speech production. A second experiment examines what mechanisms are responsible for this interactive effect. The results suggest the effect occurs on-line and is not purely driven by listener modeling. These findings are consistent with the presence of an interactive mechanism that is online and internal to the production system.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Out of sight, out of mind: The influence of communicative load and phonological neighborhood density on phonetic variation in real listener-directed speech.J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):577. doi: 10.1121/10.0009233. J Acoust Soc Am. 2022. PMID: 35105023
-
Interaction and representational integration: evidence from speech errors.Cognition. 2011 Oct;121(1):58-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Cognition. 2011. PMID: 21669409 Free PMC article.
-
Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production.Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 11;4:422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00422. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23874316 Free PMC article.
-
Speech perception.Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:49-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131643. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011. PMID: 20809789 Review.
-
Are there interactive processes in speech perception?Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Jul 13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006. PMID: 16843037 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Language Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease-Robust and Explainable Evidence for AD-Related Deterioration of Spontaneous Speech Through Multilingual Machine Learning.Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 May 19;13:642033. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.642033. eCollection 2021. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34093165 Free PMC article.
-
The phonological congruency modulated long-term form priming of Chinese characters.Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):312-333. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01462-y. Epub 2023 Oct 2. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 37782444
-
Intention in Articulation: Articulatory Timing in Alternating Consonant Sequences and Its Implications for Models of Speech Production.Lang Cogn Process. 2010 Apr 1;25(5):616-649. doi: 10.1080/01690960903395380. Lang Cogn Process. 2010. PMID: 25009365 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic hyperarticulation of coda voicing contrasts.J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Feb;139(2):EL31-7. doi: 10.1121/1.4942544. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016. PMID: 26936581 Free PMC article.
-
When overlap leads to competition: Effects of phonological encoding on word duration.Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1701-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0828-1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015. PMID: 25855202 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andruski JE, Blumstein SE, Burton M. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition. 1994;52:163–187. - PubMed
-
- Arnold J. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2008;23:495–527.
-
- Aylett M, Turk A. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A Functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in pontaneous speech. Language and Speech. 2004;47:31–56. - PubMed
-
- Baayen R, Piepenbrok R, Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium; 1995.
-
- Bailey TM, Hahn U. Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language. 2001;44:568–591.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources