Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May 1;24(4):527-554.
doi: 10.1080/01690960802299378.

Mechanisms of interaction in speech production

Affiliations

Mechanisms of interaction in speech production

Melissa Baese-Berk et al. Lang Cogn Process. .

Abstract

Many theories predict the presence of interactive effects involving information represented by distinct cognitive processes in speech production. There is considerably less agreement regarding the precise cognitive mechanisms that underlie these interactive effects. For example, are they driven by purely production-internal mechanisms (e.g., Dell, 1986) or do they reflect the influence of perceptual monitoring mechanisms on production processes (e.g., Roelofs, 2004)? Acoustic analyses reveal the phonetic realization of words is influenced by their word-specific properties-supporting the presence of interaction between lexical-level and phonetic information in speech production. A second experiment examines what mechanisms are responsible for this interactive effect. The results suggest the effect occurs on-line and is not purely driven by listener modeling. These findings are consistent with the presence of an interactive mechanism that is online and internal to the production system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean VOT differences (word with minimal pair neighbor – word with no minimal pair neighbor), Experiment 1. Error bars represent standard error.
Figure 2
Figure 2
VOT ratio (word with minimal pair neighbor / word with no minimal pair), Experiment 1. Error bars represent standard error. The dashed line represents equivalent VOTs across conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Raw VOTs for words in each condition, Experiment 2. Error bars represent standard error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
VOT ratio (relative to no competitor condition) for Experiment 2. Error bars represent standard error. The dashed line represents equivalent VOTs across conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andruski JE, Blumstein SE, Burton M. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition. 1994;52:163–187. - PubMed
    1. Arnold J. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2008;23:495–527.
    1. Aylett M, Turk A. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A Functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in pontaneous speech. Language and Speech. 2004;47:31–56. - PubMed
    1. Baayen R, Piepenbrok R, Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium; 1995.
    1. Bailey TM, Hahn U. Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language. 2001;44:568–591.

LinkOut - more resources