Why religion's burdens are light: from religiosity to implicit self-regulation
- PMID: 19949046
- DOI: 10.1177/1088868309351109
Why religion's burdens are light: from religiosity to implicit self-regulation
Abstract
To maintain religious standards, individuals must frequently endure aversive or forsake pleasurable experiences. Yet religious individuals on average display higher levels of emotional well-being compared to nonreligious individuals. The present article seeks to resolve this paradox by suggesting that many forms of religion may facilitate a self-regulatory mode that is flexible, efficient, and largely unconscious. In this implicit mode of self-regulation, religious individuals may be able to strive for high standards and simultaneously maintain high emotional well-being. A review of the empirical literature confirmed that religious stimuli and practices foster implicit self-regulation, particularly among individuals who fully internalized their religion's standards. The present work suggests that some seemingly irrational aspects of religion may have important psychological benefits by promoting implicit self-regulation.
Similar articles
-
Religiosity as identity: toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):60-71. doi: 10.1177/1088868309349693. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010. PMID: 20089847
-
Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications.Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):69-93. doi: 10.1037/a0014213. Psychol Bull. 2009. PMID: 19210054 Review.
-
The religion paradox: if religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1278-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024402. Epub 2011 Aug 1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21806304
-
Religion in the face of uncertainty: an uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):72-83. doi: 10.1177/1088868309349692. Epub 2009 Oct 23. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010. PMID: 19855094
-
Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;20(1):27-48. doi: 10.1177/1088868314568811. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016. PMID: 25673322 Review.
Cited by
-
Positive and Negative Associations between Adolescents' Religiousness and Health Behaviors via Self-Regulation.Religion Brain Behav. 2016;6(3):188-206. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1029513. Epub 2015 Apr 27. Religion Brain Behav. 2016. PMID: 27595048 Free PMC article.
-
Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction: The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors.Eur J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;42(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.860. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2012. PMID: 23487013 Free PMC article.
-
The significance of self-control.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):2639-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019725108. Epub 2011 Feb 7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21300864 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Religiosity and Suicidal Ideation in Patients With Depression.Cureus. 2025 Jun 12;17(6):e85826. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85826. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40656286 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the effect of religion on human empathy based on an adaptive temporal-causal network model.Comput Soc Netw. 2018;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40649-017-0049-z. Epub 2018 Jan 5. Comput Soc Netw. 2018. PMID: 29368758 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources