Evaluation of drug therapy for treatment of hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department
- PMID: 1994934
- DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(91)90168-j
Evaluation of drug therapy for treatment of hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department
Abstract
Oral nifedipine (N) and clonidine (C) are often used in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies; however, until recently, there were no comparative studies using the same patient population. The authors reviewed the records of hypertensive patients treated in the emergency department between October 1, 1987 and September 30, 1988. Selected patients had a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of greater than 115 mm Hg without evidence of acute end organ damage. Patients were stratified into three treatment groups: N, C, and group 3 (G3). G3 received a variety of drug therapies but not exclusively N or C. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), DBP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), percent decrease in MAP (%MAP), time to lower blood pressure, admissions, and discharges were evaluated. Efficacy and safety were defined as reaching a DBP less than 110 mm Hg but %MAP of no greater than either 25% or 40%, respectively. Thirty-five N, 32 C, and 27 G3 patients were identified with no statistical difference between groups in race, gender, pretreatment SBP, DBP, or MAP. N, C, and G3 significantly reduced SBP, DBP, and MAP (P less than .01). Comparing N, C, and G3, no differences were observed in %MAP, admissions, discharges, efficacy, or safety. Time required to decrease blood pressure differed between all three groups (44 +/- 32 N v 77 +/- 57 C v 152 +/- 94 min G3) (p less than .05). These results indicate that N, C, and a variety of drug therapies are equally effective and safe in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies.
Similar articles
-
Oral labetalol versus oral nifedipine in hypertensive urgencies in the ED.Am J Emerg Med. 1993 Sep;11(5):460-3. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90083-n. Am J Emerg Med. 1993. PMID: 8363681 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical presentation and management of patients with uncontrolled, severe hypertension: results from a public teaching hospital.J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Apr;13(4):249-55. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000796. J Hum Hypertens. 1999. PMID: 10333343
-
Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies with nitrendipine, nifedipine, and clonidine: effect on blood pressure and heart rate.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 4:S154-6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198806124-00035. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988. PMID: 2468862 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies with nifedipine.Am Heart J. 1986 May;111(5):963-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90647-2. Am Heart J. 1986. PMID: 3518379 Review.
-
Oral antihypertensives for hypertensive urgencies.Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Mar;28(3):352-8. doi: 10.1177/106002809402800311. Ann Pharmacother. 1994. PMID: 8193426 Review.
Cited by
-
Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertensive Urgency in the Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):539-550. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4277-6. Epub 2018 Jan 16. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29340938 Free PMC article.
-
Fenoldopam: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and intravenous clinical potential in the management of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies.Drugs. 1997 Oct;54(4):634-50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754040-00008. Drugs. 1997. PMID: 9339965 Review.
-
Oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies: systematic review and meta-analysis.Sao Paulo Med J. 2009 Nov;127(6):366-72. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802009000600009. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009. PMID: 20512292 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative tolerability profile of hypertensive crisis treatments.Drug Saf. 1998 Aug;19(2):99-122. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199819020-00003. Drug Saf. 1998. PMID: 9704248 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical