Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Apr;201(4):763-80.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2092-y. Epub 2009 Dec 1.

Controlling speed and direction during interception: an affordance-based approach

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Controlling speed and direction during interception: an affordance-based approach

Julien Bastin et al. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

The coordination of direction and speed of self-motion when intercepting a target moving parallel to the ground plane was examined. Subjects viewed a computer-generated environment comprised of a textured ground plane and a moving target. Turning rate was controlled using a steering wheel and speed was controlled using a foot pedal. It was hypothesized that these two degrees of freedom would be coordinated such that the speed required to intercept the target (i.e., the ideal speed) would be maintained below the subject's maximum possible speed. As predicted, subjects turned toward the target when ideal speed was less than maximum speed and ahead of the target when ideal speed was greater than maximum speed. When behavior was compared across groups with different maximum speed capabilities, it was found that the ratio of ideal to maximum speed was invariant across groups at critical points of both steering and speed adjustments. Finally, subjects rapidly recalibrated to a sudden increase or decrease in maximum speed. The results suggest that actors coordinate steering and speed during interception in a way that takes into account the limits on their action capabilities. Discussion focuses on the role of calibration and the implications of the present findings for existing models of visually guided interception.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35 - PubMed
    1. Perception. 2004;33(6):689-715 - PubMed
    1. J Mot Behav. 2002 Dec;34(4):385-404 - PubMed
    1. Hum Mov Sci. 2006 Dec;25(6):718-32 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):139-48 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources