Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;12(3):286-94.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-009-0273-5. Epub 2009 Dec 1.

Single-input-dual-output modeling of image-based input function estimation

Affiliations

Single-input-dual-output modeling of image-based input function estimation

Yi Su et al. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Quantification of small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) images necessitates knowledge of the plasma input function (PIF). We propose and validate a simplified hybrid single-input-dual-output (HSIDO) algorithm to estimate the PIF.

Procedures: The HSIDO algorithm integrates the peak of the input function from two region-of-interest time-activity curves with a tail segment expressed by a sum of two exponentials. Partial volume parameters are optimized simultaneously. The algorithm is validated using both simulated and real small-animal PET images. In addition, the algorithm is compared to existing techniques in terms of area under curve (AUC) error, bias, and precision of compartmental model micro-parameters.

Results: In general, the HSIDO method generated PIF with significantly (P < 0.05) less AUC error, lower bias, and improved precision of kinetic estimates in comparison to the reference method.

Conclusions: HSIDO is an improved modeling-based PIF estimation method. This method can be applied for quantitative analysis of small-animal dynamic PET studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Illustration of typical ROI definition. (A) Cropped transverse slice of mouse FDG PET image. (B) Left ventricle cavity ROI. (C) Myocardial ROI.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Example estimated PIFs using HSIDO and CWRU methods for a simulation study as compared to true PIF and the LV ROI TAC. (B) Example estimated PIFs using HSIDO and CWRU methods for a UCLA mouse dataset as compared to blood sample measurements and LV ROI TAC. The difference between HSIDO estimated PIF and blood measurement is mainly due to the delay and dispersion during the travel from heart to the blood sampling location, which resulted in a shorter and wider peak in the blood sample measurement in comparison to a taller and sharper peak at the heart region.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acton PD, Zhuang H, Alavi A. Quantification in PET. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42(6):1055–62. viii. - PubMed
    1. Wienhard K. Measurement of glucose consumption using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. Methods. 2002;27(3):218–225. - PubMed
    1. Fang YH, Muzic RF., Jr Spillover and Partial-Volume Correction for Image-Derived Input Functions for Small-Animal 18F-FDG PET Studies. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(4):606–614. - PubMed
    1. Laforest R, Sharp TL, Engelbach JA, et al. Measurement of input functions in rodents: challenges and solutions. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32(7):679–85. - PubMed
    1. Gambhir SS, Schwaiger M, Huang SC, et al. Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(3):359–66. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources