Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;28(4):182-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00367.x.

The assessment of frailty in older people in acute care

Sarah N Hilmer  1 , Vidya Perera, Sarah Mitchell, Bridin P Murnion, Jonathan Dent, Beata Bajorek, Slade Matthews, Darryl B Rolfson
Affiliations

The assessment of frailty in older people in acute care

Sarah N Hilmer et al. Australas J Ageing. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: Develop a measure of frailty for older acute inpatients to be performed by non-geriatricians.

Method: The Reported Edmonton Frail Scale (REFS) was adapted from the Edmonton Frail Scale for use with Australian acute inpatients. With acute patients aged over 70 years admitted to an Australian teaching hospital, we validated REFS against the Geriatrician's Clinical Impression of Frailty (GCIF), measures of cognition, comorbidity and function, and assessed inter-rater reliability.

Results: REFS was moderately correlated with GCIF (n = 105, R = 0.61, P < 0.01), Mini-Mental State Examination impairment (n = 61, R = 0.49, P < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (n = 59, R = 0.51, P < 0.001) and Katz Daily Living Scale (n = 59, R = 0.51, P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability of REFS administered by two researchers without medical training was excellent (kappa = 0.84, n = 31).

Conclusion: In this cohort of older acute inpatients, REFS is a valid, reliable test of frailty, and may be a valuable research tool to assess the impact of frailty on prognosis and response to therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources