Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov-Dec;8(6):367-74.
doi: 10.1177/1545109709352884.

A simple single-item rating scale to measure medication adherence: further evidence for convergent validity

Seth C Kalichman  1 , Christina M Amaral, Connie Swetzes, Michelle Jones, Rene Macy, Moira O Kalichman, Chauncey Cherry
Affiliations

A simple single-item rating scale to measure medication adherence: further evidence for convergent validity

Seth C Kalichman et al. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2009 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Self-report measures of medication adherence are inexpensive and minimally intrusive. However, the validity of self-reported adherence is compromised by recall errors for missed doses and socially desirable responding.

Method: Examined the convergent validity of 2 self-report adherence measures administered by computerized interview: (a) recall of missed doses and (b) a single-item visual analogue rating scale (VAS). Adherence was also monitored using unannounced phone-based pill counts that served as an objective benchmark.

Results: The VAS obtained adherence estimates that paralleled unannounced pill counts (UPCs). In contrast, self-reported recall (SR-recall) of missed medications consistently overestimated adherence. Correlations with participant characteristics also suggested that the computer-administered VAS was less influenced by response biases than SR-recall of missed medication doses.

Conclusions: A single-item VAS offers an inexpensive and valid method of assessing medication adherence that may be useful in clinical as well as research settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency distribution for adherence assessed by unannounced pill counts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency distribution for adherence assessed by self-reported recall.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency distribution for adherence assessed by the visual analogue scale.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kalichman SC, et al. Pillboxes and antiretroviral adherence: Prevalence of use, perceived benefits, and implications for electronic medication monitoring devices. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2005;19:49–55. - PubMed
    1. Petersen ML, et al. Pillbox organizers are associated with improved adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy and viral suppression: a marginal structural model analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;45:908–915. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bangsberg DR, et al. Comparing objective measures of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy: Electronic medication monitors and unannounced pill counts. AIDS and Behavior. 2001;5:275–281.
    1. Kalichman SC, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy assessed by unannounced pill counts conducted by telephone. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2007;22:1003–1006. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalichman SC, et al. Monitoring Antiretroviral adherence by unannounced pill counts conducted by telephone: Reliability and criterion-related validity. HIV Clinical Trials. 2008;9:298–308. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances