Complications and functional outcomes following complex oropharyngeal reconstruction
- PMID: 19953614
- DOI: 10.1002/hed.21290
Complications and functional outcomes following complex oropharyngeal reconstruction
Abstract
Background: We sought to evaluate postoperative complications and functional outcomes in patients who underwent oropharyngeal reconstruction after oncologic resection.
Methods: The evaluation constituted a retrospective review of 65 patients who underwent microvascular free flap (85%) and/or pectoralis pedicled flap (18%) oropharyngeal reconstruction after composite resection for advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Results: Perioperative mortality was 1.5%. Overall, 29 patients (45%) experienced surgical or medical complications; however, only 2 patients (3%) required operative intervention. The flap success rate was 100%. Eighty-six percent of patients were decannulated, 34% were able to meet all of their nutritional needs orally, and 69% attained >80% speech intelligibility. Preoperative swallowing impairment was associated with postoperative feeding tube dependence (p = .006).
Conclusions: Microvascular free flap and/or pectoralis pedicled flap reconstruction of extensive oropharyngeal defects is safe and reliable, even with advanced disease. Although most patients achieved decannulation and functional speech, almost two thirds remained at least partially feeding tube dependent.
2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2010.
Similar articles
-
Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after oncologic surgery and microvascular reconstruction in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer.Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Oct;134(10):1086-93. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.913809. Epub 2014 Aug 18. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014. PMID: 25131390
-
Functional outcomes following palatal reconstruction with a folded radial forearm free flap.Ear Nose Throat J. 2004 Jan;83(1):45-8. Ear Nose Throat J. 2004. PMID: 14986758
-
Risk factors predicting aspiration after free flap reconstruction of oral cavity and oropharyngeal defects.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Nov;134(11):1205-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.11.1205. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008. PMID: 19015452
-
Functional outcomes of soft palate free flap reconstruction following oropharyngeal cancer surgery.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2265-2271. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.044. Epub 2021 May 7. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33994058 Review.
-
Infrahyoid fascio-myocutaneous flap as an alternative to free radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction.Head Neck. 2007 Mar;29(3):285-91. doi: 10.1002/hed.20512. Head Neck. 2007. PMID: 17230563 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of T1-T2 stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with transoral robotic surgery.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan 10;8(1):103-112. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1005. eCollection 2023 Feb. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36846425 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the relationship of immunotherapy and wound complications following flap reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer.Head Neck. 2021 May;43(5):1509-1520. doi: 10.1002/hed.26601. Epub 2021 Jan 8. Head Neck. 2021. PMID: 33417293 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.In Vivo. 2018 Jul-Aug;32(4):893-897. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11325. In Vivo. 2018. PMID: 29936476 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: 10-year follow-up.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S124-S132. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Aug 5. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36064816 Free PMC article.
-
De-Escalation Strategies for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-Where Are We Now?Curr Oncol. 2022 May 18;29(5):3668-3697. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050295. Curr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35621685 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical