Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery
- PMID: 1995380
- DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(91)90188-q
Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery
Abstract
Blood loss during normal delivery was measured in 37 primiparas and 25 multiparas who had no obstetric or medical complications and who underwent normal delivery in a teaching hospital following spontaneous onset of labour at term. Measured blood loss was significantly greater than the estimated volume of blood loss. In primigravidas, the mean ( +/- SE, standard error of the mean) estimated blood loss was 260 +/- 12 ml and the mean measured blood loss was 401 +/- 29 ml. In multiparas the mean estimated blood loss was 220 +/- 10 ml and the mean measured blood loss was 319 +/- 41 ml. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower (P less than 0.05) than the mean measured blood loss in both groups. The size of the discrepancy between measured and estimated blood loss was proportional to the measured blood loss. These findings show that visual estimation of blood loss was grossly inaccurate.
Similar articles
-
Does early repair of episiotomy decrease postpartum blood loss: a randomized clinical trial.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Apr;23(4):308-10. doi: 10.1080/14767050903118296. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010. PMID: 19626571 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 May;36(2):152-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb03273.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996. PMID: 8798302
-
Postpartum haemorrhage in Zimbabwe: a risk factor analysis.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Apr;100(4):327-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12974.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993. PMID: 8494833
-
Quantitative Blood Loss in Obstetric Hemorrhage: ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION, Number 794.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):e150-e156. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003564. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31764759
-
Methods of Blood Loss Quantification in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review.Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2023;66(4):133-137. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2024.7. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2023. PMID: 38588390 Review.
Cited by
-
Improvement of the Surgical Apgar Score by Addition of Intraoperative Blood Transfusion Among Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Surgery.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Oct;20(10):1752-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3234-8. Epub 2016 Aug 12. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 27520628
-
Oxytocics for the prevention of post-partum haemorrhages. A review.Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1991 Dec 13;13(6):238-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02015577. Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1991. PMID: 1795933 Review.
-
Comparison of Modified Shock Index and Shock Index for Predicting Massive Transfusion in Women with Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.Med Sci Monit. 2024 Mar 4;30:e943286. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943286. Med Sci Monit. 2024. PMID: 38437191 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage defined by quantitative blood loss measurement: a national cohort.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02971-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32375687 Free PMC article.
-
Blood Density Is Nearly Equal to Water Density: A Validation Study of the Gravimetric Method of Measuring Intraoperative Blood Loss.J Vet Med. 2015;2015:152730. doi: 10.1155/2015/152730. Epub 2015 Jan 29. J Vet Med. 2015. PMID: 26464949 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical