Oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body removal: complications and follow-up of 102 dogs
- PMID: 19954441
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00845.x
Oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body removal: complications and follow-up of 102 dogs
Abstract
Objectives: To assess complication rate, risk factors for complications and outcome in dogs with oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body (FB) removal.
Methods: Medical records of 102 dogs undergoing endoscopic removal of oesophageal and/or gastric FBs from March 2001 to November 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. All owners were contacted by telephone to provide follow-up information.
Results: West Highland white terriers, Yorkshire terriers and Bernese mountain dogs were over-represented compared to the hospital population. Endoscopy alone was successful in 92/102 dogs (90.2 per cent), whereas gastrotomy (but no oesophagotomy) was required in 10 dogs (9.8 per cent). Complications in 13/102 dogs (12.7 per cent) were perforation (8), oesophageal stricture (1), oesophageal diverticula (1), perioesophageal abscess (1), pneumothorax and pleural effusion (1) and respiratory arrest (1). Six dogs (all weighing <10 kg) had complications resulting in death or euthanasia. Bone FBs, bodyweight of less than 10 kg, and oesophageal or gastric FB in place for more than three days were significant risk factors for complications. Of the dogs available for follow-up (75/96), 92 per cent had no complications after discharge.
Clinical significance: Endoscopic FB removal is associated with a low overall complication rate with bone FBs and bodyweight of less than 10 kg as significant risk factors.
Similar articles
-
Complications following removal of oesophageal foreign bodies: a retrospective review of 349 cases.Aust Vet J. 2019 Apr;97(4):116-121. doi: 10.1111/avj.12796. Aust Vet J. 2019. PMID: 30919444
-
Removal of oesophageal foreign bodies: comparison between oesophagoscopy and oesophagotomy in 39 dogs.J Small Anim Pract. 2015 Oct;56(10):613-7. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12386. Epub 2015 Aug 19. J Small Anim Pract. 2015. PMID: 26286121
-
Endoscopic and surgical retrieval of fishhooks from the stomach and esophagus in dogs and cats: 75 cases (1977-1993).J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Nov 1;207(9):1194-7. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995. PMID: 7559069
-
Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal foreign bodies in children.Indian J Pediatr. 1999;66(1 Suppl):S75-80. Indian J Pediatr. 1999. PMID: 11132474 Review.
-
Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: review of literature and experience in 159 consecutive cases.Laryngoscope. 2003 Jun;113(6):957-65. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200306000-00009. Laryngoscope. 2003. PMID: 12782805 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrospective evaluation of factors associated with degree of esophagitis, treatment, and outcomes in dogs presenting with esophageal foreign bodies (2004-2014): 114 cases.J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019 Sep;29(5):528-534. doi: 10.1111/vec.12875. Epub 2019 Aug 26. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019. PMID: 31448848 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging evaluation of dogs and cats with Dysphagia.ISRN Vet Sci. 2012 Oct 31;2012:238505. doi: 10.5402/2012/238505. Print 2012. ISRN Vet Sci. 2012. PMID: 23762579 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors for Death in Dogs Treated for Esophageal Foreign Body Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 222 Cases (1998-2017).J Vet Intern Med. 2017 Nov;31(6):1686-1690. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14849. Epub 2017 Oct 14. J Vet Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 29031028 Free PMC article.
-
Raw meat-based diets for dogs: survey of owners' motivations, attitudes and practices.BMC Vet Res. 2019 Mar 4;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1824-x. BMC Vet Res. 2019. PMID: 30832667 Free PMC article.
-
Current Evidence on Raw Meat Diets in Pets: A Natural Symbol, but a Nutritional Controversy.Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;15(3):293. doi: 10.3390/ani15030293. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39943063 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical