Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010:67:125-134.
doi: 10.1159/000262604. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review

Review

The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review

Erika A Woodson et al. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010.

Abstract

The Hybrid S or 'short-electrode' cochlear implant was developed to treat patients with a severe to profound hearing loss limited to the high frequencies. The short electrode is implanted into just the base or high-frequency region of the cochlea, with the goal of preserving residual low-frequency hearing. As a result, electric stimulation can be combined with acoustic stimulation in the same ear (and the opposite ear); this is one instance of 'acoustic plus electric' (A + E) stimulation. In this paper, we will review the latest findings from the first two stages of the clinical trial for the Hybrid concept in the United States. Generally, we will review surgical techniques, clinical trial criteria, residual hearing preservation, improvements in speech perception in quiet, and predictive factors for patient benefit. We will also discuss the significant benefit of A + E stimulation for speech perception in noise and musical measures of melody and instrument recognition, as well as valuable insights into central auditory nervous system plasticity gained from the use of a very short electrode array.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Iowa/Nucleus clinical trial audiometric and other inclusion criteria (see box). Light gray shows the Phase I audiometric range, and dark gray shows additional audiometric range appended in Phase II. Speech inclusion criteria for Phase II are shown with Phase I criteria in parentheses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postoperative hearing preservation results for subjects in multicenter clinical trial. A. Low-frequency threshold shifts (averaged over 125–750 Hz) in the implant ear as a function of preoperative hearing threshold for all subjects in the multicenter clinical trial at one month post-implantation (initial activation). B. Long-term threshold shifts at least 12-months after implantation. Plotted as in B.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of speech in noise for Hybrid patients, long-electrode patients, hearing-impaired patients, and normal-hearing subjects. The values shown are signal-to-noise ratios (in dB) for 50% correct recognition of spondee words in competing backgrounds of steady noise (black bars) or competing talkers (white bars). Subjects are sorted according to degree of hearing loss (average of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) and also if they are listening through a traditional long-electrode cochlear implant or Hybrid cochlear implant. Figure reprinted with permission (Gantz et al. Audiol Neurotol; 2006; 11 (suppl 1):63–68) courtesy of S Karger AG, Basel.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electric hearing. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:1726–1730. - PubMed
    1. Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant. Acta Otolaryngologica. 2004;24:344–347. - PubMed
    1. Hogan C, Turner CW. High-frequency amplification: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104:432–441. - PubMed
    1. Ching T, Dillon H, Bryne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:1128–1140. - PubMed
    1. Turner CW. Hearing Loss and the Limits of Amplification. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11(Suppl 1):2–5. - PubMed

Publication types