Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;1(4):201-6.
doi: 10.4055/cios.2009.1.4.201. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty

Affiliations

Retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty

Hyuk-Soo Han et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty are not common but are usually difficult to treat due to the advanced age of patients and frequently accompanying osteoporosis. Retrograde intramedullary nailing can be effective in promoting healing of these fractures by providing sufficient stability, but the number of beneficiaries is small due to its limited applicability and the postoperative function has rarely been assessed. This study evaluated the efficacy of retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur using the clinical outcomes.

Methods: Between January 2000 and May 2006, 9 patients (10 knees) with periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing. An open reduction and additional fixation using a shape memory alloy ring were used in 3 of them in whom a closed reduction was not successful. The clinical and radiographic findings were reviewed retrospectively in 7 patients (8 knees), excluding 2 who were unavailable for a follow-up assessment due to death. The mean follow-up period was 39 months (range, 24 to 82 months). The union and alignment of the fracture were assessed radiographically. The postoperative function was evaluated using Sanders' criteria.

Results: Radiographic union was obtained in all patients after an average of 13 weeks (range, 12 to 15 weeks) postoperatively. No postoperative infection, heterotopic ossification and component loosening were observed. After union, the coronal alignment averaged 0.1 degrees valgus (range, 3.6 degrees varus to 2.6 degrees valgus) and the mean sagittal alignment was 1.9 degrees of extension (range, 0.9 degrees of flexion to 6.3 degrees of extension). The mean range of motion was 103 degrees (range, 90 degrees to 120 degrees) postoperatively. At the last follow up, there were 1 excellent, 5 good and 2 fair results according to Sanders' criteria.

Conclusions: With retrograde intramedullary nailing, excellent fracture union and good functional recovery were obtained in patients with periprosthetic supracondylar fractures.

Keywords: Femoral fracture; Intramedullary nailing; Periprosthetic; Retrograde; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Preoperative X-rays of a periprosthetic fracture of the right knee in a 57-year-old woman. (B) X-rays taken 5 months later show mature callus formation. A short supracondylar nail was used due to femoral anterior bowing.

References

    1. Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A. Periprosthetic fractures of the knee. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):45–49. - PubMed
    1. Berry DJ. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(2):183–190. - PubMed
    1. Dennis DA. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:379–389. - PubMed
    1. Currall VA, Kulkarni M, Harries WJ. Retrograde nailing for supracondylar fracture around total knee replacement: a compatibility study using the Trigen supracondylar nail. Knee. 2007;14(3):208–211. - PubMed
    1. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;(446):167–175. - PubMed