Financial Consequences of Improved Treatments for Colorectal Cancer
- PMID: 19956780
- PMCID: PMC2739418
- DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2008.09.010
Financial Consequences of Improved Treatments for Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
Improvements in translational research have led to improved survival in patients with both localized and metastatic colorectal cancer. However, these benefits come at high costs, and the introduction of six new agents since 1996 for colorectal cancer has resulted in much higher treatment related costs. Even insured patients may face very high treatment related costs through deductibles and co-payments. In addition, since colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly, many patients may also be facing high treatment related costs for their other medical problems. Physicians should be aware of how these high costs may influence patients' treatment choices and adherence with therapy. This information may be important in counseling patients about the risks and benefits of systemic therapy. These challenges are not limited to patients with colorectal cancer, and physicians who take care of cancer patients across all disease sites will need to confront this increasingly complex issue.
Similar articles
-
Out-of-pocket cost by cancer stage at diagnosis in commercially insured patients in the United States.J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1318-1329. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2254649. Epub 2023 Oct 31. J Med Econ. 2023. PMID: 37907436
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Electronic self-reporting of adverse events for patients undergoing cancer treatment: the eRAPID research programme including two RCTs.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2022 Feb. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2022 Feb. PMID: 35138783 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Florida Controlled Substance Prescribing.2022 Oct 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2022 Oct 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 33428370 Free Books & Documents.
-
Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 May. Report No.: 17-05229-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 May. Report No.: 17-05229-EF-1. PMID: 30085502 Free Books & Documents. Review.
References
-
- Andre T, et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2343–1. - PubMed
-
- The NCCN Colon Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc; 2008. [Accessed April 30, 2008]. (Version 1.2008). Available at: http://www.nccn.org.
-
- Petrylak DP, et al. Docetaxel and Estramustine Compared with Mitoxantrone and Prednisone for Advanced Refractory Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1513–1520. - PubMed
-
- Benson AB., III New Approaches to Assessing and Treating Early-Stage Colon and Rectal Cancers: Cooperative Group Strategies for Assessing Optimal Approaches in Early-Stage Disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(22):6913s–6920. - PubMed
-
- Figueredo A, et al. Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review From the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care’s Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(16):3395–3407. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources