Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2009 Jul;48(7):570-4.

[A clinical study of leflunomide and methotrexate therapy in psoriatic arthritis]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 19957798
Controlled Clinical Trial

[A clinical study of leflunomide and methotrexate therapy in psoriatic arthritis]

[Article in Chinese]
Gai-Lian Zhang et al. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF) and low-dose MTX and LEF (MTX + LEF) combined treatment for psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: This was a 24 weeks, two-center, open-labeled, controlled trial. All subjects fulfilled the moll and wright criteria for definite PsA. Subjects were given one of the 3 regimens, MTX, or LEF, or MTX + LEF. The primary end point was proportion of psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC) response. The secondary end point was proportion of modified 20% improvement of American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response.

Results: At week 24, the percent of patients achieving PsARC in MTX, LEF and MTX + LEF group were 75.0%, 68.8%, 83.3% respectively, and the percent of patients achieving ACR20 were 66.7%, 50.0%, 83.3% respectively. At week 24, tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment (PGA), physician's global assessment, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) were significantly improved compared with base-line values (P < 0.05). At week 24, the improvement of patient's assessment of pain, HAQ, ESR were better in the MTX + LEF group compared with LEF group while the improvement of patient's assessment of pain, PGA, HAQ, ESR were better in the MTX group compared with LEF group (P < 0.05). The incidence of treatment related adverse events was 38.5%, 38.9% and 35% in MTX, LEF and MTX + LEF group respectively. There was no serious adverse reactions.

Conclusion: Low dose MTX + LEF regimen showed similar good efficacy and safety profile for PsA patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types