Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen
- PMID: 19959507
- DOI: 10.1148/rg.296095516
Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen
Abstract
The most important advantage of 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging systems is their increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared with 1.5-T systems. The higher SNR can be used to shorten acquisition time, achieve higher spatial resolution, or a combination of the two, thereby improving image quality and clinical diagnosis. In fact, 3.0-T MR imaging systems have already proved superior to 1.5-T systems in neuroradiologic and musculoskeletal applications. In the abdomen, 3.0-T MR imaging is uniquely beneficial for techniques such as enhanced and nonenhanced hepatic imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, angiography, MR pancreatography, and colonography. Admittedly, 3.0-T abdominal imaging has important technical limitations, such as standing wave artifact, chemical shift artifact, susceptibility artifact, and safety issues such as increased energy deposition within the patient's body. Furthermore, 3.0-T abdominal MR imaging is still in the early stages of development and requires substantial modifications of the pulse sequences and hardware components used for 1.5-T imaging. Nevertheless, the ability to obtain physiologic and functional information within reasonably short acquisition times with 3.0-T abdominal MR imaging bodies well for the future of this imaging technique.
Similar articles
-
Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(10):1236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.018. Acad Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16979073
-
Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: problem or a promise for the future?Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jul;16(4):325-35. doi: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000224689.06501.16. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2005. PMID: 16785848 Review.
-
3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T.Radiographics. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(7):1983-98. doi: 10.1148/rg.287075154. Radiographics. 2008. PMID: 19001653 Review.
-
3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience.Radiol Med. 2007 Feb;112(1):97-112. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0124-x. Epub 2007 Feb 22. Radiol Med. 2007. PMID: 17310287 English, Italian.
-
MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T.Epileptic Disord. 2003 Mar;5(1):3-20. Epileptic Disord. 2003. PMID: 12773291 Review.
Cited by
-
Fetal MRI at 3T-ready for routine use?Br J Radiol. 2017 Jan;90(1069):20160362. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160362. Epub 2016 Oct 21. Br J Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27768394 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ESGAR consensus statement on liver MR imaging and clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents.Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr;26(4):921-31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3900-3. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26194455 Free PMC article.
-
Breast findings incidentally detected on body MRI.Springerplus. 2016 Jun 18;5(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2343-x. eCollection 2016. Springerplus. 2016. PMID: 27386267 Free PMC article.
-
Value of 3 Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for assessing liver fibrosis.Ann Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan-Mar;28(1):118-123. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25608776 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 tesla (preliminary experience).Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Apr;44(4):376-86; quiz 373-5. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2857-0. Epub 2014 Mar 27. Pediatr Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24671739 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical