Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Jul;37(4):800-10.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp135. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

Psychotic disorders and repeat offending: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Psychotic disorders and repeat offending: systematic review and meta-analysis

Seena Fazel et al. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of repeat offending in individuals with psychosis and to assess the effect of potential moderating characteristics on risk estimates.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in 6 bibliographic databases from January 1966 to January 2009, supplemented with correspondence with authors. Studies that reported risks of repeat offending in individuals with psychotic disorders (n = 3511) compared with individuals with other psychiatric disorders (n = 5446) and healthy individuals (n = 71 552) were included. Risks of repeat offending were calculated using fixed- and random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to examine how risk estimates were affected by various study characteristics including mean sample age, study location, sample size, study period, outcome measure, duration of follow-up, and diagnostic criteria.

Results: Twenty-seven studies, which included 3511 individuals with psychosis, were identified. Compared with individuals without any psychiatric disorders, there was a significantly increased risk of repeat offending in individuals with psychosis (pooled OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-1.8), although this was only based on 4 studies. In contrast, there was no association when individuals with other psychiatric disorders were used as the comparison group (pooled OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.7-1.3), although there was substantial heterogeneity. Higher risk estimates were found in female-only samples with psychosis and in studies conducted in the United States.

Conclusions: The association between psychosis and repeat offending differed depending on the comparison group. Despite this, we found no support for the findings of previous reviews that psychosis is associated with a lower risk of repeat offending.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Risk Estimate for Repeat Offending in Psychotic Disorders Compared With Individuals With Other Psychiatric Disorders. Note: OR = odds ratio
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Risk Estimate for Repeat Offending in Psychotic Disorders Compared With Control Subjects Without Psychiatric Disorders. Note: OR = odds ratio. Weights are from fixed-effects model.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Risk Estimate for Repeat Offending in Psychotic Disorders by Gender Compared With Individuals With Other Psychiatric Disorders. Note: OR = odds ratio.

References

    1. Walmsley R. World Prison Population List. 8th ed. London, UK: International Centre for Prison Studies; 2009.
    1. Fazel S, Danesh J. Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet. 2002;359:545–550. - PubMed
    1. Geller JL, Guzdfski S, Lauterbach M. The ins and outs of 200 years of psychiatric hospitals in the United States. In: Ovsiew F, Munich RL, editors. Principles of Inpatient Psychiatry. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. pp. 3–15.
    1. Torrey EF. Jails and prisons–America's new mental hospitals. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1611–1613. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumer E, Wright R, Kristinsdottir K, Gunnlaugsson H. Crime, shame and recidivism: the case of Iceland. Br J Criminol. 2002;41:40–59.

MeSH terms