Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;26(1):32-8.

Diagnostic value of exhaled nitric oxide to detect interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis

Affiliations
  • PMID: 19960786

Diagnostic value of exhaled nitric oxide to detect interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis

K P Tiev et al. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aim: Increased alveolar concentration of nitric oxide (CA(NO)) is related to the severity of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, cut-off levels of CA(NO) to rule out, or to rule in, the presence of ILD in individual patients are unknown. We aimed to assess the validity of CA(NO) for the diagnosis of ILD in SSc and to determine the thresholds of CA(NO) that can be used in clinical practice to predict the likelihood of ILD in SSc.

Methods: Lung HRCT scan, PFTs and partitioned exhaled NO measurements were performed in 65 consecutive SSc patients. ILD was diagnosed on pulmonary HRCT according to the presence of ground glass or reticular opacities. Diagnostic performance of CANo for ILD diagnosis was assessed using ROC curves.

Results: 38 out of 65 SSc patients had ILD. CA(NO), at a cut-off level of 4.3 ppb, had a sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ILD of 87% (95% CI: 77 to 99) and 59% (95% CI: 41 to 78), respectively. The same cut-off level of CA(NO) could detect impairment of gas exchange with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% (95% CI: 67 to 90) and 73% (95% CI: 46 to 99), respectively. Moreover, ILD could be ruled in (positive predictive value > 95%) when CA(NO) > or = 10.8 ppb, and ruled out C(ANO) values < or = 3.8 ppb (negative predictive value > 95%).

Conclusion: CA(NO) could be a valid non-invasive biological marker of ILD in SSc, and be of use in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources