European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries
- PMID: 19961887
- DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.11.013
European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries
Abstract
Consumer demand in relation to food is shifting towards products that are safe, nutritious, and of good eating quality. Beef consumers are demanding for experience quality that matches their expectations, particularly with respect to beef tenderness. The development of a beef quality grading and guarantee system obtained through muscle profiling research, can allow the beef industry to meet these demands. A qualitative consumer study has been carried out with beef consumers in France, Spain, United Kingdom and Germany to assess their opinions about beef muscle profiling and their interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee. Findings indicate that both concepts are well accepted by European beef consumers, although not unconditional. Participants express some reserve related to the possible upgrading of lower value cuts, too much standardisation, and the fact that tenderness is to some extent subjective. They further require the system to be simple, sufficiently documented and independent-party controlled. This study indicates good opportunities for the development of a beef eating-quality guarantee system in Europe. As an increase in consumers' satisfaction could lead to higher consumption rates and industry profitability, the introduction of an eating-quality guarantee system can contribute to market development and improved competitiveness of the European beef industry.
Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.Meat Sci. 2010 Feb;84(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 8. Meat Sci. 2010. PMID: 20374787 Review.
-
Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef.Meat Sci. 2010 Jan;84(1):54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.037. Epub 2009 Aug 23. Meat Sci. 2010. PMID: 20374754
-
The effect of technology information on consumer expectations and liking of beef.Meat Sci. 2012 Feb;90(2):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 16. Meat Sci. 2012. PMID: 21981934
-
A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.J Anim Sci. 2009 Oct;87(10):3392-402. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1611. Epub 2009 Jun 19. J Anim Sci. 2009. PMID: 19542506
-
Meat standards and grading: a world view.Meat Sci. 2010 Sep;86(1):227-35. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 May 12. Meat Sci. 2010. PMID: 20541325 Review.
Cited by
-
Genetic Variability Impacts Genotoxic and Transcriptome Responses in the Human Colon after the Consumption of Processed Red Meat Products and Those with Added Phytochemical Extracts.Nutrients. 2024 Jan 31;16(3):425. doi: 10.3390/nu16030425. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 38337709 Free PMC article.
-
Game Meat Consumption-Conscious Choice or Just a Game?Foods. 2020 Sep 24;9(10):1357. doi: 10.3390/foods9101357. Foods. 2020. PMID: 32987949 Free PMC article.
-
Expression Marker-Based Strategy to Improve Beef Quality.ScientificWorldJournal. 2016;2016:2185323. doi: 10.1155/2016/2185323. Epub 2016 Mar 15. ScientificWorldJournal. 2016. PMID: 27066527 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution of Sensory Properties of Beef during Long Dry Ageing.Foods. 2022 Sep 13;11(18):2822. doi: 10.3390/foods11182822. Foods. 2022. PMID: 36140948 Free PMC article.
-
DNA methylation may affect beef tenderness through signal transduction in Bos indicus.Epigenetics Chromatin. 2022 May 13;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13072-022-00449-4. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2022. PMID: 35562812 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials