Comparison of the results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30% versus patients with ejection fraction >30%
- PMID: 19962482
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.059
Comparison of the results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30% versus patients with ejection fraction >30%
Abstract
The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that low-ejection fraction (EF), low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) is a predictor of major morbidity after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 597 consecutive patients with AS (mean age 72 +/- 11 years) who had undergone AVR or combined AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from 1998 to 2006 (EF < or =30% in 73 [12%]). The outcome measures included hospital mortality, major complications, and long-term survival. The overall hospital mortality rate was 4% (low-EF AS 5%; low-EF AS plus CABG 8%; AS controls 4%; AS plus CABG controls 3%; p = 0.42). Low-EF, low-gradient AS was not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality but predicted stroke (odds ratio [OR] 4.3), deep sternal wound infection (OR 10.0), sepsis (OR 6.8), gastrointestinal complications (OR 4.2), and respiratory failure (OR 4.4). The survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was 69 +/- 8%, 69 +/- 8%, and 65 +/- 8% in the low-EF, low-gradient, AVR plus CABG group and 95 +/- 4%, 92 +/- 5%, and 82 +/- 7% in the low-EF, low-gradient AVR group compared to 93 +/- 2%, 88 +/- 2%, and 78 +/- 3% in the AVR plus CABG control group and 93 +/- 2%, 89 +/- 2%, and 85 +/- 3% in the AVR control group (p = 0.001), respectively. In the patients with low-EF AS who experienced major postoperative morbidity, the 1-year survival rate was significantly reduced (54 +/- 14%) compared to those who did not (95 +/- 3%, p <0.001). In conclusion, low-EF, low-gradient AS is a predictor of increased major morbidity after AVR, which nonetheless remains the treatment of choice for most patients because of the excellent early and late survival. However, patients with strong risk factors for postoperative renal and respiratory failure might derive less benefit from conventional surgical AVR.
Similar articles
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with aortic valve replacement in healthy octogenarians does not increase postoperative risk.Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002 Sep;36(5):297-301. doi: 10.1080/140174302320774519. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002. PMID: 12470398
-
Nine-year routine clinical experience of aortic valve replacement with ATS mechanical valves.J Heart Valve Dis. 2008 Nov;17(6):648-56. J Heart Valve Dis. 2008. PMID: 19137797
-
Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;88(3):746-51. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.078. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19699891
-
Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1424-30. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00635-2. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996. PMID: 8893579 Review.
-
Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;9(3):510-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.207597. Epub 2009 Jun 4. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19497953 Review.
Cited by
-
Sex, aging, and preexisting cerebral ischemic disease in patients with aortic stenosis.Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;90(4):1230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.016. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20868818 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement and concomitant AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting.Neth Heart J. 2012 Mar;20(3):110-7. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0238-6. Neth Heart J. 2012. PMID: 22311176 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in the UK and a survey of practices.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;64(4):ezad259. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad259. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023. PMID: 37462523 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for postoperative respiratory mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Fall;2(2):60-5. doi: 10.5812/aapm.5228. Epub 2012 Sep 13. Anesth Pain Med. 2012. PMID: 24223339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of coronary artery disease severity on late survival after combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting - experience of a single cardiac surgery center.Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014 Dec;11(4):361-6. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2014.47333. Epub 2014 Nov 30. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014. PMID: 26336450 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials