Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jun;75(6):1467-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.049. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

Correlation between prostatic urethral angle and bladder outlet obstruction index in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Correlation between prostatic urethral angle and bladder outlet obstruction index in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms

Ja Hyeon Ku et al. Urology. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the association of prostatic urethral angle (PUA) with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) index in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 260 men with LUTS and/or BPH aged>50 years (median: 65.9, range: 50-87). Patients underwent an evaluation including the International Prostatic Symptom Score, serum prostate-specific antigen levels, transrectal ultrasonography, frequency-volume chart, uroflowmetry, and measurement of postvoid residual, and multichannel video urodynamic study with a pressure-flow study.

Results: Patients with higher PUA (PUA>or=35 degrees) had higher prostate-specific antigen levels (P=.043), larger prostate volume (P<.001), higher maximal urethral closure pressure (P=.004), higher detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate (P=.008), and higher BOO index (P=.032), in comparison with those who had lower PUA (PUA<35 degrees). There was no significant difference of PUA values according to the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion. When we compared BOO index according to PUA, patients with higher PUA had higher BOO index than those with lower PUA (30.6+/-1.8 vs 23.6+/-1.8, P=.006). The area under the curve of PUA was significant for BOO (area, 63.0%; 95% confidence interval, 55.1%-70.9%; P=.002).

Conclusions: PUA may be one method to asses the presence of BOO in men with LUTS and/or BPH. Our findings suggest that PUA may help in the treatment of individuals by better predicting their likely classification from a pressure-flow study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources