Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory
- PMID: 19963014
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.039
Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory
Abstract
We examined the effects of cue types on human spatial memory in 3D virtual environments adapted from classical animal and human tasks. Two classes of cues of different functions were investigated: those that provide directional information, and those that provide positional information. Adding a directional cue (geographical slant) to the spatial delayed-match-to-sample task improved performance in males but not in females. When the slant directional cue was removed in a hidden-target location task, male performance was impaired but female performance was unaffected. The removal of positional cues, on the other hand, impaired female performance but not male performance. These results are consistent with results from laboratory rodents and thus support the hypothesis that sex differences in spatial memory arise from the dissociation between a preferential reliance on directional cues in males and on positional cues in females.
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.Behav Neurosci. 2009 Apr;123(2):276-83. doi: 10.1037/a0014722. Behav Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19331451
-
Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jan 1;216(1):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.026. Epub 2010 Jul 23. Behav Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 20655953
-
Preference for spatial cues in a non-storing songbird species.Anim Cogn. 2005 Jul;8(3):211-4. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0249-4. Epub 2004 Dec 21. Anim Cogn. 2005. PMID: 15611879
-
Sex differences in chronic stress effects on memory in rats.Stress. 2002 Sep;5(3):205-16. doi: 10.1080/1025389021000010549. Stress. 2002. PMID: 12186683 Review.
-
The appetitively motivated "cognitive" holeboard: a family of complex spatial discrimination tasks for assessing learning and memory.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):379-403. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 22. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012. PMID: 21810442 Review.
Cited by
-
Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jan;44(1):86-96. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0179-5. Epub 2018 Aug 14. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019. PMID: 30143781 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reversal Training Discloses Gender Differences in a Spatial Memory Task in Humans.Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 29;13(5):740. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050740. Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37239212 Free PMC article.
-
Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks.Mem Cognit. 2013 Feb;41(2):214-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0254-9. Mem Cognit. 2013. PMID: 23055116
-
A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills.Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1503-1528. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01633-6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019. PMID: 31270765 Review.
-
How the evolution of air breathing shaped hippocampal function.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 14;377(1844):20200532. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0532. Epub 2021 Dec 27. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 34957846 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical