Performance assessment of a chest pain unit: Preliminary 2-year experience in the European Georges Pompidou Hospital
- PMID: 19963191
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.09.008
Performance assessment of a chest pain unit: Preliminary 2-year experience in the European Georges Pompidou Hospital
Abstract
Background: Chest pain units (CPUs) are very popular in the USA for the triage of low-to-intermediate-risk chest pains. However, CPUs do not yet exist in France.
Aims: To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients admitted to a new CPU in France, and to assess the quality of care with regard to identification and exclusion of an acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Methods: This prospective study included 906 consecutive patients with non-traumatic chest pain admitted to our CPU between September 2006 and August 2008. Patients were managed according to their probability of presenting with an ACS. Clinical characteristics, diagnostic tests, final diagnosis, destination and length of stay were recorded. We also assessed the 30-day outcome of patients in whom an ACS was excluded.
Results: Of the 906 patients, 27.9% had an ACS (1.3% with and 26.6% without ST-segment elevation, respectively). Non-ischaemic cardiac aetiologies and non-cardiac aetiologies were found in 123 (12.6%) and 63 (7.0%) patients, respectively. A final diagnosis of chest pain of undetermined origin was made in 51.5% of patients; among these, 17 (6.5%) patients were re-admitted to the CPU between September 2006 and September 2007. Thirty-day follow-up revealed that only one patient had subsequent confirmation of coronary artery disease requiring further hospitalization.
Conclusions: This prospective study reports the first experience of a CPU in a cardiology department in France. Our preliminary results suggest that our CPU can exclude an ACS safely. Further studies are warranted to assess the value of CPUs in France.
Comment in
-
Efficiency optimization through in-hospital reorganization: The chest pain unit challenge?Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Dec;102(12):799-801. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 27. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009. PMID: 19963190 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficiency optimization through in-hospital reorganization: The chest pain unit challenge?Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Dec;102(12):799-801. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 27. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009. PMID: 19963190 No abstract available.
-
The Chest Pain Evaluation Center at the University of Maryland Medical Center.Md Med J. 1994 Dec;43(12):1047-52. Md Med J. 1994. PMID: 7815907 No abstract available.
-
Referral patterns of patients presenting with chest pain at two rural emergency departments in Western Australia.Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;10(3):1558. Epub 2010 Sep 5. Rural Remote Health. 2010. PMID: 20815655
-
Developing a chest pain team to fast track AMI patients.Nurs Times. 2005 Feb 22-28;101(8):34-5. Nurs Times. 2005. PMID: 15754939 Review.
-
The role of nurses in a chest pain unit.Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007 Dec;6(4):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.01.095. Epub 2007 Mar 8. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17349824 Review.
Cited by
-
Cognitive behaviour therapy for non-cardiac pain in the chest (COPIC): a multicentre randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation.BMC Psychol. 2015 Nov 24;3:41. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0099-7. BMC Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26596540 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Self-referral to chest pain units: results of the German CPU-registry.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012 Dec;1(4):312-9. doi: 10.1177/2048872612463542. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012. PMID: 24062922 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of outcomes in emergency department patients with suspected cardiac chest pain: two-centre prospective observational study in Southern China.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 16;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0814-4. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018. PMID: 29769019 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical