Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of drug efficacy

Abstract

Conventional clinic measurement of blood pressure is influenced by many factors that make the technique unsuitable for the assessment of antihypertensive drug efficacy. The major drawback of conventional measurement is that it cannot indicate the duration of drug effect or the influence of antihypertensive drugs on nocturnal blood pressure. Noninvasive 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement has a number of advantages over conventional measurement: it provides a profile of blood pressure over the 24-hour period; it detects white coat responders; it is free of regression to the mean and the placebo response, thereby making it possible to consider efficacy studies which need not have a placebo phase; it enables considerably more observations than is possible with clinic measurement by increasing the power of studies, which may reduce significantly the numbers of patients needed for antihypertensive drug studies. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement offers the opportunity to study antihypertensive drugs in fewer patients with greater accuracy than is possible with conventional clinic measurement and should be a mandatory requirement for such studies.